New Zealand introduces interest deductibility concession for build-to-rent property developments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand introduces interest deductibility concession for build-to-rent property developments

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
new-zealand-4854169.jpg

Greg Neill and Young-chan Jung of Russell McVeagh analyse New Zealand’s plans to encourage build-to-rent property developments via a series of new tax measures.

New Zealand's Parliament recently relaxed restrictions on the tax deductibility of interest costs for build-to-rent (BTR) property developments. A concession has been introduced for BTR developments under New Zealand's income tax rules that limit interest deductions for residential property investment. The change was enacted by the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2022-23, Platform Economy, and Remedial Matters) Act 2023 (Tax Amendment Act) on March 31 2023, establishing BTR as a specific and recognised asset class for New Zealand income tax purposes.

What is BTR?

Broadly, BTR assets are large residential developments that comprise several dwellings to be held long-term for rental investment rather than for sale on completion. The developments are professionally managed and usually owned by a single institutional investor. BTR assets offer tenants the security of long-term leases (generally with tenant favourable break rights) and often include additional shared amenities (for example, co-working facilities, gymnasiums, or event venues).

To qualify as BTR land for the purposes of New Zealand's Income Tax Act 2007 (ITA), a BTR development must:

  • Comprise 20 or more dwellings to be used for residential tenancies;

  • Offer tenants a fixed-term tenancy of not less than 10 years;

  • Allow the tenant to personalise the dwelling to a certain extent with the consent of the landlord and in accordance with residential tenancy laws;

  • Provide that the tenant may terminate on 56 days’ notice;

  • Not include land that at any time after first meeting the above requirements, fails to meet the above requirements; and

  • Be registered with the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, which is responsible for maintaining a register of BTR land.

The BTR sector is significant in many overseas jurisdictions, and many developers and investors have increasingly been looking to invest in this space in New Zealand. Having regard to the current housing crisis across the country, research from Property Council New Zealand indicates that New Zealand could deliver over 25,000 BTR homes in the next decade if the right policy settings are adopted.

There have, however, been a number of domestic policy settings, particularly from a tax perspective, which have affected the feasibility of BTR developments. The Tax Amendment Act addresses one of these key policy issues.

Interest deduction limitation rules

The Tax Amendment Act provides that BTR land is exempted from New Zealand's interest limitation rules for residential properties under the ITA in perpetuity. The interest limitation rules disallow claiming deductions for interest in relation to residential property acquired on or after March 27 2021 (subject to exclusions), and also provide for the phasing out of interest deductions for residential property acquired prior to March 27 2021.

BTR has been added to the list of "exempted residential land" in Schedule 15 of the ITA. This exemption allows investors to deduct (from their taxable income) interest on loans relating to BTR assets, for as long as that interest has a sufficient nexus with the income derived from those assets. The exemption is retrospective from the date the interest limitation rules took effect on October 1 2021.

Further issues for BTR

While the position regarding interest deductibility is a positive step for BTR developments, the Tax Amendment Act does not address all the current legal and economic barriers to BTR in New Zealand.

Residential building owners are effectively not entitled to claim depreciation deductions from their taxable income (as opposed to the owners of non-residential buildings who are able to claim depreciation deductions of either 1.5% or 2% per annum depending on the tax depreciation method adopted). Consequently, the owner of a BTR development will not enjoy the depreciation deductions that the owner of a "non-residential building" is entitled to. Comparable types of accommodation to BTR such as student accommodation and retirement villages are generally treated as non-residential buildings for depreciation purposes.

Residential accommodation is an exempt supply of services for the purposes of the Goods and Services Tax Act 1985. Consequently, residential landlords are generally unable to recover GST input credits for expenses incurred in respect of residential developments. The inability to recover GST during the development stage materially reduces the economic feasibility of a BTR development. It also creates a disadvantage in a situation where an otherwise identical asset is developed for the purposes of selling the individual dwellings.

New Zealand's National Party, currently in opposition, introduced the "Boost Build to Rent Housing Bill" in March 2023. National's proposal seeks to address the depreciation issues by amending the ITA to permit "BTR developments" to claim depreciation deductions for income tax purposes like non-residential buildings. The proposal also seeks to align the treatment of "BTR developments" with student accommodation and retirement villages for the purposes of New Zealand's overseas investment regime, and to streamline the consent process for BTR under that regime.

Neither the Tax Amendment Act nor National's proposal address GST recoverability, although it is expected that the GST issue will be considered from a tax policy perspective soon, following the general election in October 2023.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article