Taxing shifted profits – how to tackle the new challenge in Poland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taxing shifted profits – how to tackle the new challenge in Poland

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
banknotes-4122079.jpg

Bartosz Doroszuk of MDDP offers insights on Poland’s new tax legislation on shifted profits, as the implementation deadline looms nearer.

The new tax on shifted profits has been implemented via the Polish CIT Act from January 1 2022. Since this tax is settled on annual basis, the upcoming deadline for the annual CIT return would be also the first date in which taxpayers will face the new challenge.

As a rule, the statutory deadline for tax payment falls three months before the end of the tax year. However the Ministry of Finance has recently adopted a regulation on extending the deadline for taxpayers, whose tax year ended between December 1 2022 to February 28 2023, from March 31 to June 30 2023. Thus, the prolonged deadline applies to taxpayers making the tax year the same as the calendar year.

In the case of taxpayers with an assumed tax year different than the calendar year, the tax on shifted profits is, as a rule, due within three months from the lapse of the first tax year commenced after December 31 2021.

What is also important, due to different interpretations of the initial wording, is the regulations on the tax on shifted profits have been amended as of January 1 2023. Nevertheless, in the transitional rules, the Ministry of Finance decided that taxpayers should follow the initial wording with respect to tax settlement for 2022.

The purpose and scope of the tax on shifted profits

The tax on shifted profits was introduced to combat tax evasion exercised through cross-border payments of a ‘passive’ nature, made to related parties in jurisdictions with low effective tax rates. Importantly, the tax on shifted profits applies only to payments made to recipients seated outside of the EU or EEA. Payments to taxpayers from the EU/EEA are excluded from the new tax, provided that they carry out genuine and tangible business activity.

In this view, Polish taxpayers should particularly examine their potential obligations in view of payments made to related parties in countries such as the USA, UK, Russia, China, Switzerland or Canada.

Regarding the tax on shifted profits, there are several criteria which must be jointly met by Polish taxpayers to be subject to this tax. Based on the provisions applicable for 2022, these include:

  • A relatively low level of taxation imposed in the recipient country: the effective tax rate of the contractor in its seat country must be lower than 14.25%;

  • A high level of passive income: qualifying payments must exceed 50% of the gross revenues reported by the recipient; and

  • Qualifying payments treated as tax deductible must exceed 3% of the gross tax deductible costs reported by the taxpayer (excluding debt financing costs).

Once the above circumstances apply, taxpayers must determine the tax base comprised by the sum of qualifying payments cited in the Polish CIT Act, which generally include:

  • Intangible service fees;

  • Royalties;

  • Costs related to transfer of debtor’s insolvency risk;

  • Debt financing costs; and

  • Consideration for transfer of functions, assets or risks (exit fees).

The sum of shifted profits may not be combined with any other income reported by the taxpayers and thus, the tax base may not be decreased with any losses from other sources. The applicable shifted profits tax rate is 19%.

Lastly, the tax on shifted profits may be decreased by (i) the withholding tax remitted upon payments of interest, royalties or intangible services, and (ii) the ‘hypothetical’ tax asset related to debt financing costs, treated as non-tax deductible in a given tax year, due to earning-stripping rules.

The tax on shifted profits is declared in the CIT/PD, which is an attachment to the annual CIT-8 return.

The importance of the tax on shifted profits

Considering the complexity of the regulation, numerous interpretive doubts, and the lack of existing practice from the tax authorities, it is essential for multinational capital groups exercising intra-group settlements to carefully analyse the potential impact of the discussed regulation.

Additionally, verifying potential obligations in this respect requires obtaining detailed information from the group and a time-consuming analysis of the tax position of foreign entities. Therefore, the adopted extension of deadline for the annual CIT settlement in Poland may secure the sufficient time for Polish taxpayers to perform a proper analysis and determine the potential impact of the tax on shifted profits.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article