International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Egypt amends its rules on VAT for non-resident suppliers in e-commerce transactions

Sponsored by

Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz – Grant Thornton Egypt logo.png

Rabie Morsy, Ahmed Khalifa and Sandra Aziz of Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz – Grant Thornton Egypt summarise the main changes under a newly issued decree.

On January 11 2023, the Egyptian Minister of Finance issued Decree No. 24 of 2023 (the Decree) amending aspects of Executive Regulation No. 66 of 2017 of VAT Law No. 67 of 2016 covering VAT on e-commerce transactions by introducing a registration-based collection mechanism for non-resident suppliers (NRS).

The Decree covers the following areas.

Electronic distribution platforms

The Decree introduces a new definition in the Egyptian Tax Code for “electronic distribution platforms” such as visible digital “storefronts” in the form of websites, internet portals, e-stores or internet marketplaces through which suppliers connect with clients.

Responsibility for VAT collection

The electronic distribution platform is not responsible for collecting taxes and remitting them to the Egyptian Tax Authority (ETA) if certain conditions are met.

A simplified registration process

NRS of goods or services, via any electronic channel, should register for VAT through the Simplified Registration Regime (SRR) using the electronic portal of the ETA.

If NRS do not register, the ETA will deem the NRS to be registered from the date their sales in Egypt reach the registration threshold.

Imported services

Egypt is considered the place of consumption/benefit of any imported services if provided by:

  • NRS, or their representative;

  • Any electronic means; or

  • A resident person in Egypt but provided from outside Egypt.

If the provision of a service does not require the physical presence of the supplier in a specific place, then Egypt is considered the place of supply in the following cases:

  • The non-registered service recipient is resident in Egypt if proven by details of its address, payment information and digital login;

  • The service recipient is registered in Egypt; or

  • The service recipient is a registered or non-registered Egyptian legal entity.

The reverse-charge mechanism regime on imported services

Law No. 3 of 2022 and its executive regulations introduced the SRR and specified that the obligation to charge VAT on B2C transactions, and the duty of remittance to the ETA, lies with the non-resident supplier.

For B2B transactions, local VAT registered businesses that receive services should apply the reverse-charge mechanism if the non-resident supplier is not registered under the SRR.

Under Law No. 3 of 2022, VAT-exempted businesses (not VAT registered) that receive imported services from non-resident and non-registered suppliers (under the SRR) should register for reverse-charge mechanism purposes, calculate the VAT, and remit it to the ETA within 30 days from the date of receiving the imported services.

Imported goods

VAT on imported goods is due at customs clearance unless VAT was collected by a non-resident registered supplier under the SRR.

However, the Customs Authority may charge additional VAT and other duties on any amounts not previously subjected to VAT.

Input VAT refunds

NRS under the SRR are entitled to a refund of input VAT incurred in Egypt on their purchases if they are related to the provision of their main activities.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Charlotte Sallabank and Christy Wilson of Katten UK look at the Premier League's use of 'dual representation' contracts for tax matters.
Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.