International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement
Local Insights

Automatic exchange of financial account information: a new focus for the Romanian tax authorities

Sponsored by


Andra Cașu and Diana Giușcă of EY Romania examine the ramifications of the country updating its legislative framework to ensure better alignment with the AEOI Standard.

The root cause

While Romania commenced exchanges under the Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters (the AEOI Standard) in 2017, the OECD’s Peer Review of the Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information, released in November 2022, led to the conclusion that the country’s legal framework does not fully meet the requirements of the AEOI Terms of Reference.

In this respect, Romania’s domestic legislative framework requiring reporting financial institutions to conduct due diligence and reporting procedures needed an additional alignment, particularly in relation to the scope of financial accounts and reportable accounts, as well as the due diligence procedures to identify them and the framework to enforce the requirements.

Following the conclusions of the peer review report, Romania has updated its legislative framework and implemented significant changes as regards the obligations of Romanian reporting financial institutions.

New challenges for Romanian financial institutions

In June 2022, Romania published Government Emergency Ordinance No. 102/2022 amending the Tax Procedure Code. The ordinance updates the existing AEOI legislation to transpose the OECD and European Commission recommendations regarding the implementation of the Common Reporting Standard on financial accounts. Additional amendments to the Tax Procedure Code were introduced in February 2023 through Government Ordinance No. 16/2023.

The following main legislative updates have a practical impact at the level of reporting financial institutions in Romania:

  • Reporting financial institutions are now obliged to maintain in electronic and/or physical format all the records and documents obtained during tax due diligence procedures and supporting documents of the efforts performed in complying with the Common Reporting Standard or Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) regulations for a period of 10 years from the annual reporting deadline;

  • The reporting and tax due diligence procedures with regard to the AEOI in terms of reportable accounts have been updated, which, in practice, require Romanian financial institutions to undergo an internal review of their procedures and update their procedures, processes and IT systems to be able to comply with the new legislative requirements; and

  • The National Agency for Tax Administration should perform inspections regarding compliance with the reporting and tax due diligence procedures set out in domestic legislation, and monitor undocumented accounts reported. Upon request by the tax authorities, reporting financial institutions have a 45-day deadline to provide information and documents related to the measures taken, and any evidence they relied on, for the application of tax due diligence and reporting procedures, special tax due diligence procedures, and additional reporting and tax due diligence procedures for the exchange of information relating to financial accounts, including specifically for FATCA purposes.

Moreover, in addition to the legislative amendments, the Romanian tax authorities have published on their webpages the Common Reporting Standard/FATCA Guide for Romanian Financial Institutions, along with other relevant materials and useful links to offer additional support to financial institutions in their reporting and compliance obligations related to the AEOI area.

Risks of non-compliance with the new AEOI rules

In addition to the reputational risks that reporting financial institutions have incurred with regard to potential non-compliance with the AEOI framework, the recent legislative amendments introduced significative administrative sanctions and fines:

  • Between €400 and 1,000 (about $427 and 1,069) per each reportable account in the event of inaccurate or delayed reporting;

  • Between €1,000 and 2,000 per each reportable account in the event of failure to apply the tax due diligence and reporting procedures in terms of FATCA and the Common Reporting Standard; and

  • Between €4,000 and 20,000 in the event of failure to keep all the documentation obtained during the tax due diligence and reporting procedures for 10 years, failure to provide the tax authorities with the requested documentation within the 45-day deadline, or non-reporting of the financial information related to the reportable accounts.

Final thoughts

Considering the strong focus of the Romanian tax authorities towards ensuring correct implementation of the AEOI Standard and the international tax transparency framework, it is expected that enhanced tax inspections will be initiated at the level of the Romanian reporting financial institutions soon.

More than that, given the significant fines (multiplied depending on the number of instances of non-compliance), it becomes crucial that reporting financial institutions apply due diligence procedures in a consistent manner and maintain with high accuracy any relevant information and documents to be able to provide them upon request to the tax authorities.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.