Proposed tax concession for family offices in Hong Kong SAR

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Proposed tax concession for family offices in Hong Kong SAR

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
hong-kong-264528.jpg

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG China discuss the draft legislation for implementing the concessionary tax regime for family-owned investment holding vehicles managed by a single family office in Hong Kong SAR.

Further to the Hong Kong SAR government’s consultation on the proposed family-owned investment holding vehicles (FIHVs) tax regime in March 2022 (see KPMG’s previous tax alert), the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Tax Concessions for Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles) Bill 2022 (the Bill) was gazetted on December 9 2022 and set out the draft legislation for the regime.

The tax concession

Under the concessionary regime, assessable profits derived by an FIHV from qualifying transactions and incidental transactions (subject to a 5% threshold) will be taxed at a 0% profits tax rate if the specified conditions are met. The tax concession will apply retrospectively from the year of assessment (YOA) 2022/23 upon enactment of the Bill into law.

The key requirements for an FIHV are that:

  • It must be an entity with its central management and control (CMC) exercised in Hong Kong;

  • At least 95% of its beneficial interest is held by one or more members of a family (the broad definition of “a member of the family” can be referred to Appendix 1 of this publication); and

  • It must not be a business undertaking for general commercial or industrial purposes.

The concession extends to cover special purpose vehicles held by an FIHV which are set up solely for holding and administering specified assets (i.e., Schedule 16C assets) and/or investee private companies (i.e., a family-owned special purpose entity, or FSPE).

The key requirements for an eligible single family office (an ESF office) are that:

  • It must be a private company with its CMC exercised in Hong Kong;

  • It must provide services to an FIHV (and its FSPEs and IFSPEs (a special purpose entity that is indirectly held by an FIHV and interposed between an FSPE and an investee private company)) and/or member(s) of the family (specified persons) and the related service fees must be chargeable to Hong Kong profits tax;

  • At least 95% of its beneficial interest is held by one or more members of the relevant family; and

  • It must satisfy the safe harbour rules.

Transactions eligible for the tax exemption

An FIHV may enjoy a tax exemption for profits derived from the following transactions:

  • Transactions in Schedule 16C assets (qualifying transactions); and

  • Transactions incidental to the carrying out of qualifying transactions (incidental transactions), subject to a 5% threshold.

The qualifying transactions must be carried out or arranged in Hong Kong by or through an ESF office.

The tax exemption for an FSPE also covers profits from transactions in:

  • Specified securities of, or issued by, an investee private company or an IFSPE;

  • Rights, options or interests in respect of the specified securities; and

  • Certificates of interest or warrants to subscribe for, or for the purchase of, the specified securities.

If an FIHV or an FSPE has derived assessable profits from both (i) transactions eligible for a tax exemption and (ii) non-qualifying transactions during a YOA, only those assessable profits derived from non-qualifying transactions will be subject to profits tax.

Minimum asset threshold

The aggregate net asset value (NAV) of Schedule 16C assets held by one or multiple relevant FIHVs managed by the ESF office must be not less than HK$240 million (about $31 million) as at the end of the basis period of a YOA.

In computing the aggregate NAV, (i) the NAV of Schedule 16C assets of the FSPEs held by the relevant FIHVs will count and (ii) a maximum of 50 relevant FIHVs that are managed by that office can also be included upon an irrecoverable election.

Substantial activity requirements

During the basis period of a YOA, each FIHV must meet the minimum economic substance requirements and the adequacy test.

For more details on these requirements, as well as other features of the regime – such as exceptions to the tax exemption, anti-round tripping and anti-avoidance provisions, etc. – please refer to KPMG’s publication here.

KPMG observations

KPMG welcomes the adoption of numerous refinements to the FIHV tax regime by the government based on the feedback received during the consultation exercise. However, there are still issues that have not been addressed and that may impact the attractiveness of the regime (detailed discussion on the key features of the regime can be accessed via this link).

It is understood that the FIHV tax regime will be regarded as a preferential tax regime in Hong Kong for the purpose of the specified income exclusion under the revised foreign-sourced income exemption (FSIE) regime. As such, foreign-sourced dividends, equity disposal gains and interest income derived by an FIHV or FSPE, though it may not be tax exempt under the FIHV tax regime, may be excluded from the FSIE regime and continue to be non-taxable.

Given that the draft legislation of the FIHV regime is complex, family offices which currently operate in Hong Kong or plan to be set up in Hong Kong should evaluate how the specified conditions in the regime can be fulfilled and consider whether any changes to the investment holding structure/business models are required.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Advisers won’t be short of work in a world of increased valuation disputes, documentation requirements and behavioural responses from clients seeking to protect their wealth
Jaydeep Menon explains how Frazier & Deeter built a specialist practice which helps UK start-ups expand into the US and why private equity backing is accelerating its ambitions
As joint audits, data sharing and pillar two reshape tax controversy, multinational groups can no longer afford to manage disputes one jurisdiction at a time
Brazil's tax system is being reshaped by VAT , pillar two and TP reform. Fallet explains why those changes convinced him to lead a new practice
The agreement with Daribatech, alongside recent high-profile investment in talent, suggests the firm is gearing up for a significant push in the region
Several factors have led to a steady transition of TP work away from traditional advisers and towards full-service law firms, DLA Piper’s new TP leader says
Julian Balson's departure from EY's Tier 1 tax controversy practice for lower-ranked Fieldfisher represents one of the more eye-catching UK hires of the year
Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel argues that the biggest obstacle to AI adoption in tax is not technology, but trust, and introduces a practical AI risk framework to help
Howell takes a deep dive into how he led the landmark PepsiCo dispute, discusses the ATO's enforcement priorities, and emphasises KordaMentha's market ambitions
Global tax leader David Linke said that the TaxSim gaming programme could replace aspects of traditional face-to-face learning
Gift this article