Emission control: how to be ready for the CBAM’s launch

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Emission control: how to be ready for the CBAM’s launch

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
rocket-launch-67643.jpg

John Cunningham of Deloitte Ireland explains the motivation behind the EU’s CBAM, the timeline for its intended implementation, and what companies should be doing to prepare.

Background

The CBAM is a policy in support of the EU Green Deal: the ambition of the EU to be climate neutral by 2050.

A milestone target for the EU, to achieve its climate ambition of carbon neutrality, is to reduce CO2 emissions by 55% by 2030, benchmarked on carbon emissions in 1990.

There are existing taxes on carbon-generating production in the EU, so the purpose of the CBAM is to cut carbon leakage into the EU by introducing a new carbon import levy on a category of products:

  • Iron;

  • Polymers;

  • Textiles;

  • Steel;

  • Chemicals (including hydrogen);

  • Cement;

  • Aluminium; and

  • Fertilisers.

The primary objective is to stop EU importers of CBAM products from outsourcing production to countries that do not levy carbon emissions. The policy will link the carbon levy to the carbon price payable under the EU Emissions Trading System when the same goods are produced.

The scope of the CBAM varies by product from basic forms and shapes to more complex forms in polymers. For example, where steel is manufactured into tubes, not only does the carbon released related to this production have to be captured and recorded, so do the carbon emissions from the steel production itself. This is also an example of direct and indirect carbon emissions in production processes.

Responsible party

In the proposed text of the CBAM, the party responsible for importing into the EU is the declarant for import customs clearance. The declarant can be a customs broker. However, most customs brokers deliver their services in a direct representative capacity (agent only) so the importer will be responsible, and, consequently, liable for the levy.

The declarant can be another company, but this company appointed must be established in the EU and will be responsible for carbon emission reporting on their third-country in-scope imports, and for payment of the levy when the policy becomes EU law.

The declarant for the import will need a CBAM licence to import goods and will pay the levy by purchasing carbon certificates.

Transitional period

The transitional period for the CBAM is expected to start in January 2023, during which time, EU importers must submit quarterly CBAM reports, stating their imports of CBAM products, and the emissions ‘embedded’ in their imported products.

While some of the finer details are still to be agreed on, there is little doubt that the CBAM will eventually be introduced in the EU. Based on the present positions of the legislators, the transitional period of the CBAM is scheduled to enter into force on January 1 2023. Importers will be required to start reporting emissions embedded in the CBAM products they import.

The transitional period is proposed to end in January 2027, after which the carbon levy under the CBAM must be paid. To pay the carbon levy under the CBAM, EU importers must purchase CBAM certificates covering the emissions embedded in the products they import and submit annual CBAM declarations.

Importing CBAM products, purchasing CBAM certificates, and submitting CBAM declarations will require a special authorisation (the ‘authorised (CBAM) declarant’) issued to EU importers or representatives acting on behalf of one or more importers by the competent CBAM authority.

Preparing for the CBAM: what steps to take?

Reviewing your range of products and determining what products you import from outside EU and European Economic Area countries that are in scope is important.

Below are some actions businesses can take to prepare for the transitional period of the CBAM:

  • Carry out an initial impact assessment – which of your products will be covered by the CBAM? Where do you source them from (i.e., origin country)? What is the volume of your imports of these products?

  • Set up the process to collect data on the embedded emissions – who in the supply chain holds this information? Who will reach out to the suppliers?

  • Set up the reporting process in the EU – determine the business function within your organisation responsible for the compliance requirements of the CBAM.

  • If the default option is chosen, rather than engaging with your suppliers in each country where the in-scope product is produced and develop protocols and processes for capturing the supply chain carbon emissions, the reporting will default to the worst 10% of the carbon emitting production facilities, for that product, in the country it is being produced.

Should the transitional period commence on January 1 2023, the first quarterly CBAM report will be required in April 2023.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier for them than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Taylor Wessing, whose most recent UK revenues were £283.7m, would become part of a £1.23bn firm post combination
China and a clutch of EU nations have voiced dissent after Estonia shot down the US side-by-side deal; in other news, HMRC has awarded companies contracts to help close the tax gap
An EY survey of almost 2,000 tax leaders also found that only 49% of respondents feel ‘highly prepared’ to manage an anticipated surge of disputes
Gift this article