International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sponsored

Hong Kong introduces interim measure to confirm compliance with economic substance requirements

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
hong-kong-lantau-island-1441383.jpg

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG China discuss the Inland Revenue Department’s interim arrangement that enhances taxpayers’ certainty on their compliance with the economic substance requirements under the revised foreign-sourced income exemption regime.

As a response to the EU’s concerns about Hong Kong’s existing offshore regime for passive income, the Hong Kong SAR (HKSAR) Government will introduce a revised foreign-sourced income exemption (FSIE) regime effective from January 1 2023. The relevant tax bill is expected to be gazetted in late October or early November 2022 and has to be enacted into law by the end of 2022.

To help businesses in Hong Kong to better prepare for the changes brought by the revised FSIE regime before it becomes effective, the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is going to introduce an interim arrangement under which taxpayers can seek the Commissioner of Inland Revenue’s (CIR’s) opinion (the ‘Commissioner’s Opinion’) on whether they are in compliance with the economic substance (ES) requirements under the FSIE regime according to the draft legislation once the tax bill is gazetted.

The Commissioner’s Opinion mechanism

The key features of the Commissioner’s Opinion mechanism are set out as follows:

  • The IRD would request certain information from the taxpayer to process the application, such as:

    • The details of specified economic activities carried out in Hong Kong;

    • The number of qualified employees;

    • The amount of operating expenditures incurred;

    • The amounts of turnover and profits; and

    • The details of any outsourcing arrangements.

  • The CIR will give an opinion on the taxpayer’s compliance with the ES requirements based on the draft legislation in the tax bill and the information provided, normally within one month after the application and complete information are received.

  • The Commissioner’s Opinion is not an advance ruling made under Section 88A of the Inland Revenue Ordinance. The CIR will, however, apply the enacted ES requirements according to the Commissioner’s Opinion provided that the arrangements and parameters stated in the opinion are adhered to and the enacted ES requirements are substantially the same as those proposed in the tax bill. The taxpayer can rely on the opinion to report on its compliance with the enacted ES requirements in its tax return.

  • The application can be made to the IRD during the period between the gazettal of the tax bill and the coming into operation of the corresponding ordinance. After the ordinance comes into operation, the interim arrangement will no longer be available and taxpayers can apply for an advance ruling on their compliance with the enacted ES requirements if necessary.

  • The application procedures and the detailed information required will be announced on the IRD’s website when the tax bill of the revised FSIE regime is gazetted.

KPMG observations

KPMG welcomes the introduction of the above interim measure for the revised FSIE regime, which is a novel mechanism offered by the HKSAR Government for providing greater tax certainty to taxpayers. The interim measure illustrates the HKSAR Government’s commitment to promoting tax certainty in Hong Kong and facilitating businesses in Hong Kong to cope with the revised FSIE regime.

Multinational entity groups in Hong Kong relying on an offshore claim for non-taxation of offshore passive income should make good use of this interim measure if they are seeking certainty on their compliance with the ES requirements under the FSIE regime. Before submitting an application, these groups should perform a self-assessment on their current level of ES in Hong Kong and consider whether any changes to their holding structures or operating models are necessary to minimise the chance of getting an adverse opinion from the CIR. They should also consider how to best present the information requested in their applications to the IRD.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.