New legal definition establishes the taxable basis of Brazilian excise tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New legal definition establishes the taxable basis of Brazilian excise tax

Sponsored by

logo.png
book-3294950.jpg

Cecilia Yokoyama and Juliana Mari Tanaka of Machado Associados discuss the legal definition of praça that sets the taxable basis for excise tax in transactions carried out between interdependent companies.

The Brazilian excise tax (IPI) legislation determines that the current price in the ‘praça’ (‘trading area’) of the sender’s wholesale market must be used as the minimum amount of the IPI taxable basis in transactions between interdependent companies.

The lack of a legal definition of praça started a discussion regarding the geographic definition of the sender's praça, including questions such as “would it correspond to the city where the sender’s establishment is located or to the state of the sender’s establishment?”

It is important to point out that the Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (CARF) of the Federal Revenue Service of Brazil, based on the initial concept adopted by the federal tax authorities, consolidated the discussion in 1981, recognising that the sender´s trading area corresponds to the geographic space of its city.

In this sense, the Federal Revenue Service of Brazil published a COSIT (General Tax Coordination Office in Brazil) internal ruling in 2012 clarifying that “the minimum taxable amount applicable to shipments of a certain product from the manufacturing establishment, with a single interdependent distributor in its trading area, will correspond to the prices practised by this single distributor in the wholesale sales of said product.”

The broad concept of praça changed the reference to consider it as the city, the neighbouring state or interstate territory, the metropolitan region’s territory, or anywhere, as it is not identified by any circumscribed and determined spatial criterion, but rather by the seller’s field of activities, even if by third parties that resell its products.

Therefore, other decisions have been rendered by the CARF since 2012 with multiple – and extremely broad – interpretations on the matter, including the entire domestic territory in this concept.

A legal definition of praça is necessary to put an end to the several administrative and judicial discussions on the value to be considered as the minimum amount for calculation of the IPI taxable basis.

According to the recent legal definition provided by Law 14395, published on July 8 2022, praça means the territorial space of the municipality where the sending establishment is located, confirming the concept initially defined by the Federal Revenue Service of Brazil in 1981.

Nevertheless, although the legal definition of the term praça seems to put an end to this discussion, there are new discussions at the CARF regarding the understanding that this legal definition as provided for by Law 14395/2022 would apply only after its publication.

To summarise, with this legal amendment, federal taxpayers are now confident in calculating the minimum taxable amount as the IPI taxable basis, considering the municipality where the sending establishment is located as the praça. However, the discussion about the effects of the law is now open.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article