International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China customs refines voluntary disclosure rules

Sponsored by


Lewis Lu of KPMG China discusses the refined voluntary disclosure regime implementation rules for customs duty, valid from July 2022 to the end of 2023.

On June 30 2022, the Chinese General Administration of Customs (GAC) issued GAC Announcement No. 54. This refines the implementation rules for the voluntary disclosure regime set out in GAC Announcement No. 161, issued in 2019. The refined rules are valid from July 1 2022 to December 31 2023. In parallel, Announcement No. 161 was voided.

Drawing on international best practice, a voluntary disclosure regime (the regime) was initially introduced by the State Council in the revised customs inspection regulations in 2016.

Under the regime, import/export enterprises may be subject to more lenient penalties where they voluntarily report their tax violations to the customs authorities in written form and rectify them promptly.

Key changes

Since its introduction, the regime has contributed toward enhanced enforcement efficiency. Announcement 54 includes several key changes.

Enhanced access to penalty exemption

Announcement 54 provides that an enterprise may be exempted from penalty (i) where a tax violation is voluntarily disclosed to the customs authorities within six months of its occurrence (regardless of the quantum of arrears); or (ii) where a tax violation is disclosed between six months to a year after occurrence and the taxes in arrears is less than 30% of the total tax payable or less than RMB 1 million ($145,000).

Previously, the time threshold was set at three months and for the second case it was ‘after three months’, while the underpaid tax threshold was 10% (or RMB 0.5 million).

Customs ‘credit rating’ impact

The China tax system, including the customs authorities, maintains ‘credit ratings’ for taxpayers. A low rating (the result of repeated violations) can lead to enhanced scrutiny and reduced access to preferential tax/customs services (e.g., import ‘green channels’).

Per Announcement 54, where an enterprise voluntarily discloses its tax violation and is subject to a customs warning or an administrative penalty under RMB 1 million, it will not be ‘marked down’ in the customs credit rating system. Previously, the penalty threshold was RMB 0.5 million.

Clarity on reduction to fines for overdue customs payments

Under the Chinese customs system, unpaid tax can be subject to both penalty and fines for overdue payment. The regime deals with relief from the penalty, but reduction of fines for overdue payment is subject to other regulations.

The earlier Announcement 161 had not made clear how voluntary disclosures on the regime would impact on taxpayer access to procedures to reduce the overdue fines. Announcement 54 now makes clear that this reduction can be applied for in parallel with the process for relief under the regime.

Repeated disclosure

Voluntary disclosure regime abuse is addressed by a new rule providing that the penalty mitigation rules do not apply to a tax violation disclosed twice. This prevents enterprises from dividing a tax violation of more than RMB 1 million into several violations, each with a smaller amount, to improperly access the regime benefits.

Looking ahead

In view of the more lenient treatment under Announcement 54, import/export enterprises are encouraged to set up self-inspection mechanisms to identify potential non-compliance in a timely manner. This will allow them to access the benefits of the new policy within the designated timeframes.

It is expected that the regime will be clarified to cover other non-compliant customs matters, such as quarantine violations.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.