International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China customs refines voluntary disclosure rules

Sponsored by


Lewis Lu of KPMG China discusses the refined voluntary disclosure regime implementation rules for customs duty, valid from July 2022 to the end of 2023.

On June 30 2022, the Chinese General Administration of Customs (GAC) issued GAC Announcement No. 54. This refines the implementation rules for the voluntary disclosure regime set out in GAC Announcement No. 161, issued in 2019. The refined rules are valid from July 1 2022 to December 31 2023. In parallel, Announcement No. 161 was voided.

Drawing on international best practice, a voluntary disclosure regime (the regime) was initially introduced by the State Council in the revised customs inspection regulations in 2016.

Under the regime, import/export enterprises may be subject to more lenient penalties where they voluntarily report their tax violations to the customs authorities in written form and rectify them promptly.

Key changes

Since its introduction, the regime has contributed toward enhanced enforcement efficiency. Announcement 54 includes several key changes.

Enhanced access to penalty exemption

Announcement 54 provides that an enterprise may be exempted from penalty (i) where a tax violation is voluntarily disclosed to the customs authorities within six months of its occurrence (regardless of the quantum of arrears); or (ii) where a tax violation is disclosed between six months to a year after occurrence and the taxes in arrears is less than 30% of the total tax payable or less than RMB 1 million ($145,000).

Previously, the time threshold was set at three months and for the second case it was ‘after three months’, while the underpaid tax threshold was 10% (or RMB 0.5 million).

Customs ‘credit rating’ impact

The China tax system, including the customs authorities, maintains ‘credit ratings’ for taxpayers. A low rating (the result of repeated violations) can lead to enhanced scrutiny and reduced access to preferential tax/customs services (e.g., import ‘green channels’).

Per Announcement 54, where an enterprise voluntarily discloses its tax violation and is subject to a customs warning or an administrative penalty under RMB 1 million, it will not be ‘marked down’ in the customs credit rating system. Previously, the penalty threshold was RMB 0.5 million.

Clarity on reduction to fines for overdue customs payments

Under the Chinese customs system, unpaid tax can be subject to both penalty and fines for overdue payment. The regime deals with relief from the penalty, but reduction of fines for overdue payment is subject to other regulations.

The earlier Announcement 161 had not made clear how voluntary disclosures on the regime would impact on taxpayer access to procedures to reduce the overdue fines. Announcement 54 now makes clear that this reduction can be applied for in parallel with the process for relief under the regime.

Repeated disclosure

Voluntary disclosure regime abuse is addressed by a new rule providing that the penalty mitigation rules do not apply to a tax violation disclosed twice. This prevents enterprises from dividing a tax violation of more than RMB 1 million into several violations, each with a smaller amount, to improperly access the regime benefits.

Looking ahead

In view of the more lenient treatment under Announcement 54, import/export enterprises are encouraged to set up self-inspection mechanisms to identify potential non-compliance in a timely manner. This will allow them to access the benefits of the new policy within the designated timeframes.

It is expected that the regime will be clarified to cover other non-compliant customs matters, such as quarantine violations.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023