International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Managing Tax Disputes Summit: Mismatches in global TP audits laid bare

L to R: Derya Bresser; Carolina del Campo; Brad Rolph

Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation

Taxpayers may have strong transfer pricing documentation in place but authorities’ aggressiveness could still lead to lengthy audits, according to experts at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Forum yesterday, September 27, in Amsterdam.

In Spain, for example, taxpayers can expect a TP audit to last for 27 months on average.

“It’s common, especially in TP, that they [tax authorities] open for three years and close for adjustment,” explained Carolina del Campo, partner in TP and tax governance at law firm Cuatrecasas based in Madrid, during the panel.

“If you don’t do it, they would normally open a new tax audit,” she added.

Spanish law demands taxpayers to prepare TP documentation including the master and local file, while larger groups must also follow country-by-country reporting requirements.

TP adjustments arising from audits are common, meaning preparing ahead of that adjustment before tax authorities make any investigation is even more crucial.

Most importantly, TP audits in Spain are not only targeted at multinationals but also at smaller firms with domestic transactions.

“They [tax authorities] are making an exchange of information for TP matters, such as asking about the TP policy and are incorporating that information in the audit,” said del Campo.

“From the beginning, you need to find a strategy. Try to look at tools available,” she added.

Going after ‘everyone’

Brad Rolph, partner and national leader of TP at consulting firm Grant Thornton in Canada, stressed the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) aggressiveness towards corporations’ TP documentation.

“Canada goes after everyone,” said Rolph.

The CRA’s request for TP adjustments depends on each particular case and individual transaction, according to Rolph.

TP audits in Canada will most likely require a company’s TP documentation based on a query sheet.

“They have a standard form and would ask you a standard form of question. Some auditors like to find the information required – they will try to do a field audit as much as they possibly can,” explained Rolph.

However, the Canadian TP laws also lack specific regulations, according to Rolph. While the CRA recognises OECD guidelines, the laws do not incorporate the guidance itself.

Since OECD reports are not formally recognised by the Canadian courts, corporations are solely required to keep all records of non-arm’s-length transactions.

“It’s the law that matters and not the OECD guidelines,” said Rolph.

But tax authorities’ level of aggressiveness also depends on their resources, according to Rolph.

As opposed to the CRA, the Internal Revenue Service lacks resources to go after smaller firms when it comes to TP audits, meaning companies within this scope are less likely to be targeted by the US tax authority.

The US has strong TP laws in place, requiring taxpayers to maintain a range of information known as the principal and background documents. This can include anything from a description of the company’s organisational structure to an explanation of comparables used.

ITR’s Global Transfer Pricing Forum Europe is also taking place in Amsterdam, on September 28 and 29, and we will be bringing you more coverage from that event.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.
Corporate tax is set to rise in the UK for the first time in decades, but the headline rate remains historically low despite what many observers think.
President Joe Biden’s nominee is set to be confirmed as IRS commissioner for a five-year term.
British companies are waiting to hear the details of what will replace the 130% ‘super-deduction’ next week, while Spain considers stopping a major infrastructure company moving to the Netherlands.
President Joe Biden wants to raise corporate tax and impose a higher stock buyback tax on US businesses, but his budget proposal faces insurmountable obstacles in Congress, writes Ralph Cunningham.
EY is still negotiating the terms of the plan to split its audit and consulting functions, but the future of tax services is reportedly a sticking point.
Country-by-country reporting is the best option for safe harbour provisions under the global anti-base erosion rules, according to tax directors at companies including Standard Chartered Bank and Pernod Ricard.