All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

IFA 2022: leaders warn DSTs are tip of iceberg in world fractures

Iceberg in ocean. Hidden threat or danger concept. Central composition.

Government officials and OECD leaders say digital service taxes are only the first set of unilateral risks to come if there are not enough countries to implement the two-pillar solution.

Tax certainty to avoid fracturing the international tax system is an elusive element of the two-pillar framework. Corporate directors on a panel at the IFA/OECD seminar on September 7 shared similar concerns about double taxation from digital services taxes (DSTs) and other national measures, such as withholding taxes and transactions taxes, which would widen the tax base in several countries.

Gael Perraud, deputy director of international tax and European affairs in the French Finance Ministry, said there is no choice but to succeed at implementing the two-pillar framework.

“DSTs are just the tip of the iceberg,” said Perraud regarding the double tax risks to come if global coordination fails and the two-pillar solution does not find the “critical mass” of participating countries it needs to work.

“Waiting for longer does not help developments, we have to conclude the deal sooner than later,” he continued, suggesting that negotiations with stakeholders could go on for ages with reviews.

The alternative to the two-pillar solution is a string of unilateral measures, including DSTs, which would likely start a global trade war. This was exemplified when the US issued tariffs and trade restrictions on EU countries for unilateral measures – many started and ended in 2020.

The other six panellists were Pascal Saint-Amans, director of the Centre for Tax Policy and Administration at the OECD; Achim Pross, head of the OECD’s International Cooperation and Tax Administration Division; Lisa Wadlin, head of tax at Netflix; Peter Shaw, head of tax audit and litigation at Maersk; Manal Corwin, tax principal at KPMG in Washington, D.C.; and Ruth Mason, professor of tax law at the University of Virginia.

“If DSTs are the tip of the iceberg, then governments are on the Titanic,” said Corwin.

Saint-Amans, who has led many of the ongoing negotiations on the two-pillar framework, said several countries are tempted to enhance their taxing rights alone, rather than wait beyond the deadline in 2024 to implement the final versions of pillar one and pillar two.

Panellists also emphasised that there are risks to not having enough countries implement the two-pillar solution and align the technical rules by the deadline.

Critical mass

Advisers and government officials on the panel said if the requirements are too narrowly defined to get the right critical mass of countries to join, then it does not incentivise participation.

“It’s a huge disincentive for any one country to contribute the whole Amount A,” said Corwin.

“You need a critical mass [of countries] to move forward and achieve stability in the international tax system,” she added.

Attaining that critical amount will pressure other countries to sign on to the tax reforms.

Panellists called the approach a feat of “diabolical engineering” and “devilish logic”, with many commending its potential to introduce influential changes in international policy.

Saint-Amans noted that an adequate critical mass for Amount A rules in pillar one’s design can be considered later. However, he also said the US must be a part of pillar one, or there will be no critical mass.

Corwin, who has experience in international tax policymaking at the US Treasury, explained that the Biden administration does not consider pillar one a centrepiece of its policy objectives.

However, Corwin also said the administration still supports pillar one, but there needs to be a commercial reason for its rules to materialise in the US market.

“It has not been fleshed out enough to make its way to Congress,” she said.

“However, we do not want to rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic either,” she added, expanding on the analogy.

All stakeholders want the two-pillar solution to be administrable, reliable and sufficiently grounded in existing international tax principles.

As government negotiations continue and the OECD races against an aggressive deadline to pressure enough countries to adopt these regulations, there is a looming risk of wider fractures in the international tax system.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2022!
US technology company Cisco Systems hopes shareholders will reject a proposal to make its CbCR public, while the UK approves an extradition case connected to the ‘cum-ex’ scandal.
Tax leaders have warned that the latest UK interest rate increases could land a further blow on MNEs, which are already struggling.
Panellists said OTP can improve corporations’ forecasting and data usage, with one describing improvements as 'night and day'.
Digital services companies are increasingly selective about the countries where they register for VAT, basing their choices on revenues and risks of penalties.
The Women in Business Law Awards is excited to present the shortlist for the first Global Awards
Like medicine, tax is an evolving science. Norah Al Khalaf explains how tax policies have changed across the member states of the Gulf Cooperation Council and what tax departments should prepare for next.
The departing OECD director said countries’ sovereignty is crucial to pillar two while speakers questioned current tax policies.
World tax leaders and departing OECD director Pascal Saint-Amans said they would work increasingly hard to implement pillar two, during the IFA Congress.
This week the European Commission is facing opposition over its windfall tax proposal, while Tesla is considering moving production to the US over tax breaks.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree