International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A closer look at transactions between Mexican related parties

Sponsored by

Changes to Mexico's TP regime

Carlos Pérez Gómez and Alberto Platas of HLB MAAT Asesores discuss how the transfer pricing regime in Mexico has been modified to apply equally to transactions with foreign and domestic related parties.

The transfer pricing (TP) rules in Mexico have been explicit regarding the taxpayers’ obligations in relation to transactions entered with foreign related parties, while for transactions with domestic related parties some of the obligations were implicit or inferred. 

This situation motivated the Mexican tax authorities (MTA) to publish, for more than 10 years, explanatory rules to clarify the obligations and tax requirements applicable to transactions with related parties within Mexico.

Until fiscal year 2021, the main differences regarding compliance for transactions with foreign and domestic related parties, are detailed below:

  • Supporting documentation (TP report): There was an explicit obligation for transactions carried out with foreign related parties, nonetheless only through normative criteria the understanding was that the obligation was also applicable for domestic transactions.

  • Informative return for related parties’ transactions: Although there was a specific TP informative return for transactions with foreign related parties, there was the intention – without success – through rulings, that taxpayers also disclose information on national intercompany transactions.

  • To determine if the transactions celebrated with related parties meet the arm's-length principle: For a long time, taxpayers were uncertain whether the arm’s-length principle reached domestic transactions. That being said, the MTA never stopped enquiring about domestic transactions for TP purposes in audit procedures.

  • Related parties’ definition (in a section and article for transactions with related parties abroad): By use of regulatory criteria, it was interpreted that the definition of related parties encompassed transactions with both related parties, foreign and domestic.

  • Use of the OECD TP guidelines (in a section and article for transactions with related parties resident abroad): By use of regulatory criteria, it was interpreted that the use of the OECD TP guidelines was applicable for transactions with both related parties, foreign and domestic.

  • The statutory period for a TP audit is longer when it involves foreign and domestic related parties.

From fiscal year 2022, the TP rules in Mexico are reformed, and the distinction between foreign and domestic related parties is removed, by equally applying the obligations to both types of entities. Therefore, it will not be necessary to have normative or interpretation criteria for its application in domestic transactions.

The scope of some international legislation regarding TP did not foresee transactions with domestic related parties. However, for more than 10 years Mexico has been emphasising the application of the TP regime to these transactions.

Several experts consider that there is a neutralising effect in transactions between domestic related parties, since, in the same country a person taxes the income of a transaction, the counterparty would deduct the expense of the same operation. Furthermore, under a TP adjustment – that would increase or decrease the original value of the transaction – the balance between the parties involved would be cancelled.

However, the concern of the MTA, regarding the TP regime in transactions between domestic related parties, is attributable to the following:

  • There are special regimes within the Mexican territory that would make profit shifting among domestic related entities an eroding scheme for the MTA, for example the income tax rate in the border states is lower than the general rate;

  • There is not always a natural balance, since in some transactions, for example the sale of assets such as PP&E, lands, shares and intangibles, when the seller can accumulate or tax the profit (sometimes a loss can be obtained), the buyer can only deduct a portion of the value of the asset that it acquires through depreciation or amortization on annual basis, and in the case of shares it cannot deduct any value until its sale, as part of the cost; and

  • In the groups of national companies, there may be entities with high profits while others may have losses. This could lend to recognise transactions among themselves – or, making transfer price adjustments between them – with the intention to reduce both high profits and losses; all intended to pay less taxes at a consolidated level.

From 2022, the TP regime in Mexico is modified to apply equally to transactions made with foreign and domestic related parties, thus providing certainty to taxpayers when complying with their TP obligations.



Carlos Pérez Gómez

Partner, HLB MAAT Asesores





Alberto Platas  

Director, HLB MAAT Asesores




more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.