A closer look at Estonian CIT in Poland

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A closer look at Estonian CIT in Poland

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
The ‘Polish Deal’ is a complex tax reform

Łukasz Kosonowski of MDDP discusses the Estonian CIT and explains who is likely to benefit the most from this new form of taxation for the corporate taxpayer.

The ‘Polish Deal’ is a complex, and probably the hugest, tax reform in Poland seen for years. It has brought significant changes to the so-called Polish ‘Estonian CIT’ –  a new form of taxation introduced to Polish tax law in 2021.

In short, the Estonian CIT allows corporate taxpayers to defer payment of corporate income tax (CIT) at the point of profit distribution, up to a few years. However, due to restrictive and unprecise regulations, only a few hundred entities have chosen it so far. However, this may change from 2022 as the new law not only reduces the list of requirements that need to be fulfiled in order to qualify for the Estonian CIT, but it is also more attractive compared to other forms of taxation. 

The effective taxation rate of income tax (both for companies and individuals – CIT and personal income tax (PIT)) may be as low as 18.1% (in case of entities whose turnover does not exceed €2 million) or 21.2% (for other entities) - most likely the lowest possible tax rate among many different forms of business taxation in Poland. This is in line with the option to defer payment of tax up to 4.5 years.

The Estonian CIT is in principle allowed for any businesses, with one exception being a financing and crediting activity. It is particularly interesting that real estate companies are also allowed to opt for it. 

The legal form is also not a problem – limited liability company, joint stock company, limited partnership or so-called ‘simple joint stock company’ (new corporate form, dedicated to new ventures and start-ups), are all eligible. 

Also, the scale of the business does not matter any longer (from 2022) – small, medium as well as large entrepreneurs will be allowed to choose this taxation model. In addition, the Polish Deal also brings another awaited change – starting from 2022, the requirement to incur investments expenditure will be removed.

So, where is the catch? In fact, there are not many – but one of the most important things is to fulfil the so-called ‘simple capital structure’ criteria. This means in practice that a company may be entitled to the Estonian CIT only if its direct shareholders are individuals (not companies or other entities) and at the same time the company does not have any subsidiaries. 

This certainly limits the number of eligible entities, but apart from this all other requirements should be simple to fulfil. One of the requirements is related to minimal required employment – the companies applying the Estonian CIT should employ a minimum of three employees; but even this condition may be milder in case of new companies or so-called ‘small taxpayers’ (turnover below €2 million).

While the Estonian CIT is only formally allowed for Polish tax resident companies, there are no limitations for individuals who are shareholders of such companies. Thus, it should be also considered as an investment vehicle for non-Polish tax resident individuals interested in investing or doing business in Poland.

 

 

Łukasz Kosonowski

Partner, MDDP

E: lukasz.kosonowski@mddp.pl

 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article