Norway proposes new limited access to cross-border group contributions within the EEA
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Norway proposes new limited access to cross-border group contributions within the EEA

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
The Norwegian government has proposed a new rule for cross-border group contributions

Heidi K Skovdahl and Inger Camilla U Gjeruldsen of Deloitte Norway explain the proposal for a new rule on cross-border group contributions, codifying the principles from EU/EEA law regarding ‘final loss’.

The Norwegian government has proposed a new rule for cross-border group contributions. The new rule codifies and clarifies existing practice which allows deductions for group contributions to companies within the European Economic Area (EEA) which has a ‘final loss’, subject to several limiting factors. The proposal is expected to be effective from income year 2021.

Background

As a starting point, the current Norwegian tax rules limits deductions for group contributions to those made to Norwegian companies. In 2017, the EFTA Court gave its advisory opinion to the Court of Appeal in the case E-15/16 Yara International ASA. The EFTA Court concluded that the Norwegian statutory rules were in breach of the EEA agreement in cases where a contribution to an EEA subsidiary covers a ‘final loss’ in the subsidiary. This was accepted by the Norwegian government and the Court of Appeal in the Yara case. 

Definition of ‘final loss’

The proposed new rule codifies the principles from the Yara case and clarifies the term ‘final loss’ in line with principles established under EU case law (e.g. the 2005 CJEU decision in case C-446/03 Marks & Spencer). According to the proposal, a loss is final when:

  • All options for using the loss have been exhausted (including past, present, and future periods), and the reason for the non-utilisation is due to the taxpayer’s specific facts and circumstances (i.e. not due to rules on expiration of losses or a lack of legal basis for using the loss);

  • The business activities in the subsidiary have ceased; and

  • A liquidation process for the foreign subsidiary has been initiated immediately following the year in which the loss is deducted (the liquidation process generally must be finalised within the same year as initiated).

Other requirements

The recipient must be an EEA resident company that has an actual establishment and carries out genuine business activities in the EEA state. Furthermore, the recipient must meet the general requirements for group contributions, that is more than 90% ownership and voting rights in the subsidiary on December 31 in the deduction year. Indirect ownership also fulfils the requirements if the foreign subsidiary is owned indirectly through an entity that is tax resident in Norway or in the foreign subsidiary’s residence state.

Limitation of deduction in certain circumstances

The government proposes several limitations of the deduction in the contributing company. 

First, the final loss must have been carried forward to, or occurred in, the income year in which the Norwegian parent company deducts the group contribution. 

Second, the loss must have arisen while the ownership and control requirements for group contributions were met. 

Third, the deductible amount is limited to the lower of the taxable loss under the rules of the foreign subsidiary’s residence state and the taxable loss the subsidiary would have had if it was subject to tax in Norway.

Fourth, the deduction is reduced correspondingly if the foreign subsidiary within the last five years has transferred or received assets or obligations with latent gains or losses, and such gains or losses has not been recognised as income or been deducted for tax purposes. 

Further considerations

Based on the wording of the current proposal, the new rule will only apply to a few cases. Taxpayers should therefore have a certain amount of loss before it is useful to check whether all the conditions are met. 

 

Heidi K Skovdahl

Associate, Deloitte Norway

E: heskovdahl@deloitte.no

 

Inger Camilla U Gjeruldsen 

Senior manager, Deloitte Norway

E: igjeruldsen@deloitte.no

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm’s new Asia-Pacific head James Badenach tells ITR that A&M Tax can provide an alternative in the region to a “constrained” ‘big four’
As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Speaking exclusively at ITR’s Transfer Pricing Forum in Europe, the Commission’s Marc Clercx also addressed industry concerns over the arm’s-length principle
After a protracted offensive from 10 Australian professional bodies, a Senate motion to strike out contentious new tax ethical rules has failed, but concessions were secured
The closely watched decision represents the final nail in the coffin for Apple and serves as a warning to other multinationals, experts have suggested
UK tax advisers have branded Reeves’ pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% as “a smart move” and “an easy give”
Gift this article