Australia announces expanded double tax treaty network
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia announces expanded double tax treaty network

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
A significant expansion of Australia’s double tax treaty network has been announced

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper describes how the expansion of the double tax treaty network in Australia is very timely and well supported.

The Australian treasurer, Josh Frydenberg, announced on September 15 2021, a significant expansion of Australia’s double tax treaty network to stimulate economic integration through foreign investment and trade, among other things.

It is intended that Australia will enter into 10 new or updated double tax treaties by the end of 2023, the first phase of which will include a revised Indian–Australian treaty as well as new treaties with Luxembourg and Iceland.

Further revised or new treaties are proposed with Greece, Portugal and Slovenia.  According to the government’s media release, six of the 10 countries have been identified at this time with further analysis and consultation planned with a view to determining further treaty updates/renewals. 

In recent years, Australia has entered into two new treaties most importantly with Israel in 2020 and Germany in 2017.

The government has restated its commitment to modernise and expand Australia’s double tax treaty network and has committed critical resources and funding to support this expansion of Australia’s double tax treaty network.

Australia has 45 bilateral double tax treaties which will be significantly expanded by this recently announced initiative. The government has welcomed a public consultation along with a formal submission process with submissions due by October 31 2021.

Australia has been a strong supporter of the multilateral instrument which was largely operative for many of our existing double tax treaties from 2019–2020.

Although no decisions have been made at this stage various features associated with the OECD/G20 BEPS initiatives is expected including related to transparent entities, permanent establishments, concessional dividend, interest and royalty withholding taxes, limitation on treaty benefits, mutual agreement procedure, dispute resolution/arbitration and related initiatives. 

Australia was an early supporter of BEPS 1.0 including the related action plans, and has been actively involved in BEPS 2.0 including the proposed pillars one and two which are currently the subject of much global discussion and negotiation.

With the increasing integration and overlay of economic, foreign investment and security arrangements globally, this government initiative is very timely and well supported.



Jock McCormack

Partner, DLA Piper Australia

E: jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent UK case law shows the courts are ready to use a realistic approach to withholding tax exemption issues, writes Michael Alliston, partner at Norton Rose Fulbright
Attendees will meet for a networking dinner before a series of in-depth, practical discussions on pillar two, TP, ESG and more
Australian advisers should tread carefully when using new reporting obligations to complain about peers, Tax Practitioners’ Board chairman Peter de Cure tells ITR in an exclusive interview
As German clients attempt to comply with complex cross-border rules, local advisers argue that aggressive tax authorities are making life even harder
Based on surveys covering more than 25,000 in-house lawyers, the series provides insights into what law firms must score highly on when pitching to in-house counsel
The UK tax authority reportedly lost a case due to missing a deadline; in other news, Canada has approved pillar two legislation
There will always be multinationals trying to minimise tax by pushing the boundaries of their cross-border arrangements, Rob Heferen claimed
HMRC’s attempts to crack down on fraudulent tax relief claims are well-meaning, but the agency risks penalising genuinely innovative businesses, writes Katy Long of ForrestBrown
Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa are among the countries the OECD believes could benefit from the simplified TP rules
It comes despite an offshore enabler penalty existing in the UK throughout the entire period
Gift this article