International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

VAT rules for e-commerce: Really a simplification?

Sponsored by

logo.png
New VAT rules may further complicate VAT compliance obligations

Fernando Matesanz of Spanish VAT Services considers whether the VAT regulations for e-commerce will really simplify things for companies.

The VAT regulations for e-commerce operations came into force throughout the EU on July 1 2021. 

These regulations are mainly contained in two EU Directives (Directives 2017/2455 and 2019/1995) and aim to simplify the VAT taxation of e-commerce through the approval of different one-stop shop systems that can be used by e-commerce operators selling goods to consumers domiciled in EU member states.

As mentioned, one of the objectives (not the only one) is to simplify compliance with the declaration and registration obligations for companies carrying out e-commerce activities. In addition, the regulations are intended to considerably increase VAT collection in this type of operations, especially in cases where the suppliers of the goods are established in non-EU countries. 

However, depending on the type of activities that each operator intends to carry out, things may not be so simple.

Firstly, the VAT regulations may oblige EU taxable persons to register under different VAT regimes:

  • The general VAT system. If, for example, the taxable person makes supplies of goods to other taxable persons even if these sales are made online;

  • The union scheme. If the EU taxable person carries out electronic supplies of services or intra-community distance sales of goods to consumers in the EU; and

  • The import scheme. This regime is applicable to sales of goods dispatched to consumers from countries outside the EU that meet certain requirements.

For non-EU taxpayers who, in addition to selling goods online, provide services to private customers domiciled in the EU, there is an additional regime to register. The so-called non-union scheme.

When using the import regime, taxpayers will need a special identification number. In other words, companies will now have two tax identification numbers and will have to use one or the other depending on the nature of the operation.

In addition, those EU companies that use the services of certain marketplaces that help them to manage their EU sales and that, in many cases, imply that the goods of the taxable person are moved throughout the EU territory keeping stock of them in different countries depending on the needs of the market (something very common nowadays), will not be able to benefit in many cases from the one-stop-shop, being obliged to keep their VAT records in all these member states where they keep stocks of product.

In other words, in practice, these EU sellers will have to continue to keep their local VAT numbers and, in addition, they may need to have a new VAT number if they are going to make use of the Import scheme. Under the regimes, they will be able to file one-stop-shop declarations in their member state for certain types of sales (not all). However, if they operate in different countries and keep stocks of products in those countries, they will still have to file VAT returns and intra-community sales reports in those countries.

E-commerce operators will also be obliged to keep a series of records with information on all their transactions covered by the special regimes. These records must be available to the administration for quite long periods of time.

All of the above confirms that there is a big difference between the theoretical explanations that have been given about the regulations and the reality when it comes to putting them into practice. 

One of the benefits of the regulations is that they will undoubtedly help to improve VAT collection, especially in cases of imported goods, since with the regulation in force until June 30 2021 hardly any VAT was paid in the realisation of this type of operations leaving companies selling EU goods (not imported into the EU) in a clear detrimental situation.

It is therefore worth asking whether the VAT regulations for e-commerce will really simplify things for companies or whether, on the contrary, they will further complicate VAT compliance obligations. These obligations will be especially complex for platforms facilitating these type of activities who, since July 1 2021, have a series of formal obligations and assume a series of responsibilities that in some cases may be difficult to comply with.  

Given the tremendous complexity and the constant changes in these digital business models, it is also worth asking whether the regulations that have come into force will soon become obsolete and, if so, when will this happen? Bets are welcome.

 

Fernando Matesanz

Managing director, Spanish VAT Services

E: fmc@spanishvat.es

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.