International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Challenges of applying VAT to e-commerce in Africa

Sponsored by

Lobo Vasques
The application of VAT to e-commerce is one of the most difficult problems for modern tax administrations to deal with

Sérgio Vasques of Lobo Vasques discusses the challenges less robust tax administrations face when applying VAT to e-commerce.

Just what the doctor ordered

The application of VAT to e-commerce is one of the most difficult problems for modern tax administrations to deal with and a major issue on the international tax agenda. 

Cross-border business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions, in the form of low value consignments or the consumption of online services, are now part of the daily life of the population in the most developed economies and in a growing number of developing countries. 

If controlling these operations is difficult enough for tax administrations endowed with the necessary technical and human resources, it proves all but impossible for less robust administrations. As a result, many developing countries where VAT had been making its way are now faced with a new risk of base erosion. Tax revenue grows as the middle class expands and middle classes everywhere are increasingly spending their money online.

Remedies to the problem have been much discussed and put to the test.

As for cross-border B2C trade in goods, it is critical that customs be spared the effort of monitoring an immense number of small consignments. The optimal solution is to demand VAT from the supplier, customs being a fallback only. Where possible, postal intermediaries can also be involved in assessing the tax. 

For cross-border B2C services, the problem is much more difficult since there is no physical bottleneck that can be used for tax assessment. VAT can only really be claimed from suppliers and marketplaces, forcing them to register in the state of destination. Financial intermediaries may provide a safety valve for tax assessment as a fallback solution.

The implementation of these solutions requires the creation of simplified registration rules and dedicated interfaces that can facilitate the payment of VAT by non-resident suppliers, as well as access to information from financial intermediaries that allows monitoring the taxable operations performed by each foreign supplier.

Easier said than done

These remedies are not easy to apply, least of all in developing countries. First, getting non-resident suppliers to register requires a bargaining power that many states do not have. For larger markets such as Angola this may not prove too difficult. For smaller markets such as Cape Verde or Mozambique the strength to persuade suppliers in Europe, the US or China to register and declare tax regularly may be lacking. Second, obtaining information from payment services providers which is essential for tax control is not always easy in these jurisdictions, either because there is no tradition of the tax administration accessing financial information, or because there is fear of misuse.

Still, you must start somewhere. Countries such as Angola, Cape Verde and Mozambique, with growing urban middle classes and where e-commerce has become even more widespread as a result of the pandemic, are preparing to take their first steps, following the lead of other African nations such as Kenya or South Africa. It will be necessary to perfect VAT place of supply rules, set up simplified registration schemes, strengthen reporting rules and publicise the new regimes. 

It makes sense to go about this stepwise, namely by first targeting a limited list of large suppliers, where the largest volume of transactions is concentrated, and then expanding the list as the tax administration becomes more robust. In the absence of negotiating strength to force non-resident suppliers of goods and services to register, the use of mechanisms to publicise non-compliant companies is also being considered, creating a reputational cost that could lead benchmark companies to comply with their obligations even where the markets involved are still small. 

There certainly is an understanding in these countries that no solution will allow the whole of cross-border transactions that consumers now perform online to be brought within the taxable base. It is important, in any case, to quickly implement rules that operators and consumers get used to, proceeding, if needed, by trial and error, so that cross-border electronic commerce does not keep growing in a vacuum. Besides, recent times have shown that the explosion of cross-border online purchases of goods and services can create a significant competitive disadvantage for domestic businesses, adding insult to injury in the current crisis scenario. 

It is true that tax administrations are better equipped to deal with the challenges of e-commerce in countries where the middle class is larger. But even in those countries there is always a mismatch, well evidenced by the pandemic: consumers change their habits faster than the tax administration.

 

Sérgio Vasques

Founding partner, Lobo Vasques

E: sergio.vasques@lobovasques.com

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.