International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong SAR: Welcomes tax concession for carried interest

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
Concessional tax treatment for carried interest is effective from April 1 2020

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG discuss the tax concession for carried interest in Hong Kong SAR.

The concessional tax treatment for carried interest is now effective from April 1 2020 and will provide for a 0% tax rate for qualifying carried interest. 

The concession involves a number of conditions that need to be satisfied in order for the carried interest to qualify for the concession.  These include being a qualified recipient, the need to comply with headcount and operating expenditure substance requirements, as well as the need for the fund be certified by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the Inland Revenue Department (IRD).

Application procedures

The new concession applies to carried interest received or accrued from April 1 2020.  As such, private equity (PE) funds should now be considering whether they should be applying for the concessionary treatment for any payment of carried interest after that date.

Guidance on the application procedures have been released by the HKMA setting out how a fund may seek to become certified with the HKMA.  In the draft guidance that has been made available for comment, the application process may involve an application to the HKMA and an application for assessment to the IRD to confirm that the fund qualifies as a fund for the purposes of section 20AM of the Inland Revenue Ordinance (IRO). At the time of writing, the details of what information the IRD will require has not yet been provided. 

The certification of the fund will need to demonstrate that it will invest in PE type investments, and that it will have a sufficient level of domestic staffing and expenditure.  Also, specific details of the qualifying investments made by the fund may also be required.  This perhaps involves a level of detail that was not anticipated by the industry and it has questioned the need for such specific and detailed investment related information to be provided by the fund.

The application procedures may differ slightly depending on whether the application is made upfront or in the year in which the carried interest is earned. However, essentially the same level of information will be required.

Ongoing requirements to avail of the concession may also require further approval requests to the HKMA in the year carry distributions are made, together with an external auditor’s report, that the criteria for certification still apply. 

The criteria in the auditor’s report are yet to be issued by the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants, although the HKMA has clarified that the focus of the report will be on whether distributions have been paid out of eligible investments, and whether domestic substance requirements on employment and expenditure have been met. 

Additionally, it is proposed that a responsible officer will be required to notify the HKMA within 30 days of the fund no longer complying with the criteria for certification.

Going forward

Overall, the concessional tax treatment for carried interest distributions on carried interest should be welcomed by the industry.  

Whilst acknowledging the HKMA’s need for a base level of information to satisfy itself that the fund will operate as intended under the concession, it is hoped that the level of detail required is not excessive as this may cause many existing offshore funds to question whether it will be worth providing such information – particularly given that the IRD may have a greater involvement in the certification process that previously envisaged.  

Earlier consultation documents indicated that the HKMA would administer the concession and that the IRD would only consult with the HKMA to consider if investment management services are eligible.

If the HKMA can strike the right balance with satisfying itself that the concession will not be abused, and encouraging the fund management industry to get on with utilising the various tax concessions, Hong Kong SAR should continue as the leading jurisdiction for offshore funds to establish their regional platforms.

 

Lewis Lu

Partner, KPMG China

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com

 

John Timpany

Partner, KPMG China

E: john.timpany@kpmg.com

 

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Brazilian government may be about to align the country’s unique system with OECD standards, but this is a long-awaited TP reform and success is uncertain.
Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.