Hong Kong SAR extends profits tax concession for certain insurance businesses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong SAR extends profits tax concession for certain insurance businesses

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
Hong Kong SAR government has released a stream of tax incentives to bolster the financial services industry

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG discuss the profits tax concession for certain insurers in Hong Kong SAR.

The Hong Kong SAR government has released a stream of tax incentives to bolster the financial services industry. It therefore came as no surprise that the government introduced a concessionary tax regime to further develop the insurance sector and bolster Hong Kong SAR’s competitiveness as an international insurance hub and risk management centre.  

Tax concession

Previously, Hong Kong SAR had a concessionary tax regime whereby a profits tax rate of 8.25% (half of the current profits tax rate of 16.5%) was available to authorised captive insurance business and reinsurance business of professional reinsurers in Hong Kong SAR.  

Effective from March 19 2021, the new rules extend the concessionary tax regime to certain qualifying insurance-related businesses as follows:

  • All general reinsurance business of a direct insurer (‘specified insurer’);

  • Certain types of general insurance business of a specified insurer (‘specified general insurance business’); and

  • Certain types of insurance brokerage business of licensed insurance broker companies.

However, there is a specific carve-out for specified general insurance business covering the following five types of risk and liabilities, namely: 

  • Health risk;

  • Mortgage guarantee risk;

  • Motor vehicle damage risk;

  • Employees’ compensation liability; and

  • Owners’ corporation third-party liability.

The new rules contain an anti-avoidance provision (i.e. a main purpose test) to deny the concessions if a direct insurer enters into a transaction or a series of transactions with a person for the sale or purchase of insurance or reinsurance and the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, in entering into the transactions is to avoid or postpone the liability to pay tax or reduce the amount of tax liability (e.g. where direct insurers buy reinsurance among themselves to cede part of their respective risks primarily for a tax benefit).

The new rules also include provisions on:

  • Ascertaining the assessable profits of the qualifying insurance business that are chargeable to profits tax at 8.25% as opposed to other businesses that are subject to the current profits tax rate of 16.5%; and

  • The treatment of losses where a person derives concessionary trading receipts and normal trading receipts from carrying on qualifying insurance business and other business.

To meet the international standards on BEPS, the Ordinance has included substantial activity requirements that must be met in order to qualify for the concessionary regime.  

Specifically, the tax concession applies to qualifying taxpayers operating in Hong Kong SAR and require that the core income generating activities are undertaken in Hong Kong SAR provided threshold requirements are met. 

KPMG observations

The new tax concession for insurance-related businesses could potentially attract more insurers and insurance brokers to set up or relocate their regional hubs to Hong Kong SAR.  This also places Hong Kong SAR insurance businesses with a competitive advantage to position itself to capture opportunities for businesses looking to invest in the Belt and Road, and Greater Bay Area initiatives. 

Taxpayers should review their current operations and activities, and consider the commercial and tax implications of any potential restructuring to meet the qualification requirements.  

Taxpayers should also review their operating protocols and Hong Kong SAR presence to ensure that they meet the threshold requirements to enjoy the profits tax concession.  It is expected that the Inland Revenue Department to issue guidance on the application of the concession in due course, ideally including comments on transition to the new rules.

 

Lewis Lu

Partner, KPMG China

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com

 

John Timpany

Partner, KPMG China

E: john.timpany@kpmg.com


 

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Gift this article