India decides to fight Cairn arbitration decision
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India decides to fight Cairn arbitration decision

Every case sets a standard

The Indian government will appeal the arbitration decision to award Cairn Energy $1.4 billion in a transfer pricing dispute after negotiations between the company and the government failed to produce a compromise.

The Cairn case is not over despite almost a decade in the courts and subsequent talks between the Indian government and the energy company to try and settle the claim. The government is appealing the decision in case Cairn tries to claim its award.

One government official told the media that “just in case enforcement proceedings are initiated, India is confident to address them and will strongly defend its interests and sovereign rights”.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled against the Income Tax Department on December 23 2020. Facing growing unease among its shareholders, Cairn Energy has identified the Indian state assets it could claim as payment for the $1.4 billion arbitration award.

The company has also turned to other countries for support. Courts in five countries, including the UK and the US, have since recognised Cairn’s claim to the arbitration award. Nevertheless, the Indian government is sticking to its position in the case.

“Cairn had set up a tax abusive structure and did not pay taxes anywhere in the world on the gains that it made in India,” said the government official, according to media reports. “It was well within India’s sovereign powers to redress the situation of double non-taxation and tax abuse.”

Cairn CEO Simon Thomson travelled to Delhi to meet with Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman and then Finance Secretary Ajay Bhushan Pandey in February 2021. Unfortunately, the talks did not produce an agreement to finally end the dispute and the hopes of a solution were dashed.

However, the Indian official stressed that the government is still “open to a constructive settlement of tax disputes within the existing legal framework”. It may take yet another round in court to end this case once and for all.

Background of the case

The Cairn case revolves around capital gains tax on a restructured company sold a decade ago. The Edinburgh-based company restructured its operations in India and transferred ownership of its Rajasthan oil field to Cairn India in 2006.

As part of the plan, Cairn India acquired the entire share capital of Cairn India Holdings from Cairn UK Holdings in exchange for 69% of its shares. The company argued this was a business reorganisation with no tax motive driving it, but the Indian Tax Department saw it differently.

In 2011, Cairn Energy sold most of its holding in the Indian unit to billionaire Anil Agarwal’s Vedanta Resources for $8.7 billion. However, the tax authority barred the company from selling the residual stake of 9.8% and the government froze the dividend payments from Cairn India to Cairn Energy.

The Indian government retrospectively amended the tax rules in 2012 to grant itself the power to go after merger and acquisition (M&A) deals all the way back to 1962 if the underlying assets were in India. “The 2012 amendment muddied the waters for everyone,” said Chitranshul Sinha, partner at Dua Associates.

In 2014, the tax department argued that the UK oil and gas company owed $1.4 billion in capital gains tax from the flotation of its Indian subsidiary on the Bombay Stock Exchange in 2007. The tax authority would later seize 10% of Cairn India’s shares, valued at around $1 billion, in pursuit of back taxes.

After failing to resolve the matter through the Indian judiciary, the Edinburgh-based company filed a dispute under the UK-India investment treaty and sought international arbitration that started in 2015 for the losses over expropriation of its investments in India from the minority holding.

Despite attempts to reach a $600 million settlement, the case continued and the government tried to raise pressure on the company to concede. It would be five years before Cairn got the ruling it wanted.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague ruled in favour of Cairn over the Income Tax Department. However, the Indian government gave no indication it would comply with the decision. As a result, the case will continue in Singapore, where the Indian authorities have also appealed the Vodafone case.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Firms with a broad geographic reach are more likely to win work, especially from global companies with high turnovers, according to survey data of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
Australian businessman Gordon Merchant used EY’s advice to offset an A$85 million capital gain, according to the Federal Court
Griggs has been drafted in ahead of schedule as the incumbent Tim Ryan departs for Citigroup; while the Netherlands plans to scrap a 15% share buyback tax
Authorities must ensure that Russian firms do not use transfer pricing schemes to increase profits made from oil sold in different markets, advocacy organisations have argued
Fallet, a partner at law firm Mauger Muniz Advogados in Brazil, tells ITR about his passion for tax law, the leaders who inspired him, and what makes tax cool
The former chief operating officer will assume the role on July 1
Ahead of next week's Indirect Tax Forum in London, ITR spoke with Christian Van Der Valk of Sovos about how different governments and companies are embracing e-invoicing
Konrad Jeczewski has alleged he was threatened with negative reviews before being made redundant by EY Australia
The suggestion was welcomed by Skadden’s European tax head at a special event on space and tax
A majority of clients – particularly high-earning businesses – want advisers with demonstrable social credentials, according to a survey of more than 28,000 corporate counsel
Gift this article