International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Thailand: A closer look at the updates to CbCR

Sponsored by

hlb-thailand-2.png
The reform will progressively reduce corporate income tax

Andrew Jackomos and Rohit Sharma of HLB Thailand assess how country-by-country reporting (CbCR) regulations are evolving in Thailand, and consider the implications for businesses.

The Thai Revenue Department (TRD) has recently released draft rules for country-by-country reporting (CbCR) for public consultation.

These rules propose making the CbC report effective in Thailand for accounting periods commencing on or after January 1 2020, so taxpayers need to familiarise themselves with the proposal.

The changes have come about as part of Thailand’s commitment to implement the OECD/G20 BEPS project outcomes. This is a significant development for Thailand, which informs the world that it is serious about tackling BEPS.

The draft rules spell out the definitions as provided by the 2017 OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for enterprise groups, multinational enterprise (MNE) groups, constituent entities (CE), ultimate parent entities (UPE), and surrogate parent entities (SPE).

Taxpayers are provided guidance on matters, such as who will be impacted by this law, what the filing obligations are, the format of CbCR, means of filing the CbC report and the timelines.

Which entities are subject to CbCR?

Any entity that satisfies one of the following criteria, and has consolidated group revenues of no less than THB 28 billion ($925.6 million approximately) in the immediately preceding accounting period, is obligated to prepare and submit a CbC report.

If the accounting period of the preceding year is less than 12 months, the revenue threshold will be calculated proportionally to such accounting year. For example, if the accounting period of the immediately preceding year was from January 1 2020 - June 30 2020, the revenue threshold would be THB 13,923.50 million (THB 28 billion x 182/366 days).

General cases

  1. A Thai headquartered (HQ) MNE group - an entity registered under Thai law and is the UPE of the group, or the SPE as appointed by the UPE to file the CbC report in its tax jurisdiction, as required.

  2. The SPE registered under Thai law - as appointed by the group to file the CbC report on behalf of the group.

Specific case

An entity that does not satisfy conditions one and two of the general cases, but is carrying on business in Thailand (foreign MNE subsidiaries) and meets one of the following conditions:

  • A foreign UPE of the MNE group (located outside of Thailand) that does not require the UPE to file a CbC report in its tax jurisdiction and the UPE does not appoint the SPE in the jurisdiction that requires surrogate parent filing of the CbC report;

  • If the foreign UPE of the MNE group or SPE, located outside of Thailand, does not have a qualified competent authority agreement (QCAA) with Thailand, or such QCAA is not yet effective at the last day of the CbC report submission period; or

  • The TRD has been notified of the systematic failure from the residence jurisdiction of the UPE or SPE.

Reporting deadline

If the above threshold and conditions are met, the Thai-based UPE or SPE must prepare and submit the CbC report within 12 months (in a general case) of the last day of the financial reporting year. For a specific case, the report must be filed within 60 days of being requested by the TRD.

Reporting format

The CbC report should be in English and filed electronically. It should follow the CbC report XML Schema as prescribed by the OECD. The currency used when preparing the CbC report would be the functional currency of the UPE.

Below is an illustrative chart that assumes the reporting entity has a December 31 year-end, summarising the CbC report timelines:

Figure 1: CbC reporting timelines

25bf71612baa4ae897d12eed190e60ed

Assessing the impact of the draft rules

It can be argued that the most significant impact will be felt by Thai HQ MNE groups which will be required to prepare and file a CbC report for the first time as a result of the new rules. The draft rules are mostly in-line with the OECD.

For the MNE groups with UPEs located outside of Thailand, but operating within Thailand, the new rules provide flexibility and allow for CbC reports (FY2020 and onwards) to be filed in Thailand.

Although Thailand has signed the multilateral competent authority agreement (MCAA), it is yet to activate any exchange relationships with other tax jurisdictions. Nevertheless, it is expected that these will be activated to enable the exchange of data/information with other tax jurisdictions automatically.

There are still many unanswered questions, such as whether a local filing is required for previous years (in case the Thai group was subject to CbCR in other countries), notification requirements, or how to address different year ends to arrive at a consolidated group revenue.

It is expected that the TRD will release formal guidance on areas discussed above to implement the rules effectively.

It is an opportune time for MNEs to evaluate their transfer pricing risks and ensure that their policies properly allocate profits to the various jurisdictions in which they operate.

Andrew Jackomos

T: +66 8 9666 7968

E: andrew.j@hlbthailand.com



Rohit Sharma

T: +66 6 2714 0577

E: rohit.s@hlbthailand.com



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.