International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong SAR: A look at the US executive order on shipping tax

Sponsored by

The court had to decide on two separate questions

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG China analyse the impact of the US executive order on shipping taxes for Hong Kong SAR.

The US government notified Hong Kong SAR of its decision to suspend or terminate the agreement for double taxation relief in respect of income from the international operation of ships. The agreement had been in effect since 1989.

It is not immediately clear from the statement issued whether the agreement has been terminated or suspended, however, the terms of the agreement only provide for termination. No notice period is set out in the terms of the agreement, which may mean that it ceases to have effect immediately.

As a result of this, the US and Hong Kong SAR ship operators no longer enjoy an exemption from the taxes of the other jurisdiction when sailing into or out of the relevant territory. In the case of the Hong Kong SAR ship operators visiting the US, this may mean that they become subject to a 4% tax on their US gross transportation income (USGTI). In many cases, USGTI is 50% of the non-US corporation’s shipping income pertaining to its voyages to, or from, the US.

Interestingly, this puts Hong Kong SAR ship operators in a comparatively worse position than ship operators from mainland China, which has a double taxation agreement with the US. This would seem to be inconsistent with the broader policy intent expressed by the US administration to treat Hong Kong SAR as a part of the mainland for a range of purposes. Furthermore, the scope of the mainland treaty does not extend to Hong Kong SAR.

Exemptions under US domestic law may continue to apply to exempt certain ship operators, depending on where they are organised and who their owners are. One of the conditions for the US exemption is whether the ‘country’ where the operator is organised grants an equivalent exemption from tax to US companies. The US has historically treated Hong Kong SAR as a separate country for the purposes of the US Internal Revenue Code (see Notice 97-40).

It may therefore be possible if the Hong Kong SAR government were to grant a unilateral exemption to US shipping that the termination or suspension of the shipping agreement would have little practical effect on Hong Kong SAR ship operators coming into or out of the US, although US policy in respect of Hong Kong SAR remains in a state of flux and it is possible that there may be further changes.

Affected operators should consult tax experts to determine whether they are eligible.

Lewis Lu

T: +86 10 8508 5002


John Timpany

T: +852 2143 8790


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.