Poland: Interest rates cut followed by tax modifications

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Interest rates cut followed by tax modifications

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
field-4400519-1920.jpg

Bartosz Głowacki of MDDP discusses the tax implications of the cut in interest rates, the changes to payment liabilities and VAT.

The National Bank of Poland has cut down interest rates and as a consequence, the maximum interest rate in any commercial transaction cannot be higher than 7.2% per annum. 

Higher rates in future transactions will not be executable. Higher interest rates agreed in the past are also limited to 7.2% per annum. Agreements governed by foreign (non-Polish) law are subject to the same rule, if the agreement relates to Poland. 




Interest exceeding the maximum can still be paid. The statutory maximum does not mean that the debtor is not allowed to pay more, but if he does, the excessive interest will not be tax deductible. On the other hand, the creditor will be taxed on the full amount of the interest received. In cross-border transactions, the reduced treaty rates will not apply to the excess above the statutory maximum. 



From January 2020, the ‘anti-bad debt’ income tax measurements apply. 



Micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) have to be paid by large enterprises in 30 days. In symmetric relation, different deadlines can be agreed to the extent that this is not grossly unfair to the creditor. The debtor, other than MSME, has to inform other party to the transaction that he is not MSME. Failure to do so means that they can be punished with high fines. 



Tax deducted liabilities that are outstanding for more than 90 days from the maturity date are no longer deductible and have to be included in taxable income of the debtor. 



The creditor, on the other hand, is allowed to decrease the income by the value of such overdue receivables. The debtor is obliged to adjust the income, the creditor has an option. This applies to transactions carried out within creditor and debtor business that are subject to income tax in Poland. 



The ‘bad debt’ adjustment is to be completed on an ongoing basis (i.e. during the tax year) and has an impact on advanced income tax payments. The annual income tax settlement has to include detailed information on overdue payments that adjust income, including the name and tax ID of the debtor. 



The situation of debtors has slightly changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At present, debtors that suffer from COVID-19’s negative economic consequences, and have reported an income fall of 50% or more when compared to the similar period of previous year, are not obliged to convert outstanding liabilities into taxable income as described above. 



The income tax ‘anti-bad debt’ measurements do not apply to related party transactions. Related debtors will not have to increase their income if they do not pay related contractors within 90 days from the maturity. On the other hand, related creditors will not be allowed to decrease their income by the value of overdue liabilities.



Income tax ‘anti-bad debt’ adjustment is accompanied by similar measurements in VAT although the latter also applies to related party transactions. Input VAT deducted on payments outstanding for more than 90 days becomes non-recoverable for the debtor. Relevant adjustment is required. 



At the same time, the creditor is allowed to reduce the output VAT basis by the amount of 90 days overdue receivables. Both adjustments are not retrospective and are to be done in ongoing VAT settlements. The pandemic has little influence on these VAT rules. 



Bartosz Głowacki

T: +48 22 322 68 88

E: bartosz.glowacki@mddp.pl







more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
Gift this article