New Zealand updates COVID-19 tax measures to include reforms to tax loss rules
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand updates COVID-19 tax measures to include reforms to tax loss rules

Sponsored by

New Zealand has set out its plans to protect the economy

Brendan Brown and Matt Woolley of Russell McVeagh explain New Zealand’s latest tax measures to support businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The New Zealand government has announced further tax-related measures intended to assist businesses dealing with the implications of COVID-19. As with earlier COVID-19-related tax measures, the latest announcement includes a mix of temporary measures and medium to longer-term reforms. 

The three most recently announced measures (detailed more fully below) are a new tax loss carry-back regime, reforms to the criteria for carrying forward tax losses to future years, and greater flexibility to extend deadlines due to COVID-19 related disruptions.

Tax loss carry-back regime (temporary version enacted)

A new tax loss carry-back regime will enable a firm to offset a loss in a particular tax year against a profit in a previous year, and receive a refund of the tax paid in the previous (profitable) year. The new regime will be introduced in two stages:

(a) First, a temporary mechanism will allow businesses that anticipate a loss in either the 2019-20 year or the 2020-21 year to estimate the loss and use it to offset against taxable income in their previous year. This may entitle them to a refund of tax paid in the previous year. The temporary mechanism can be accessed by request via the Inland Revenue's website shortly following enactment.

(b) Second, permanent loss carry-back rules will be consulted on over the course of this year and legislation introduced and enacted by early 2021.  Officials' guidance indicates that the permanent regime may be more traditional, such as not allowing a refund before the loss has been established and may have more integrity measures. The longer-term regime may provide for a one-year or two-year loss carry-back.

Reform to tax loss carry-forward rules (expected to be enacted by early 2021)

Existing New Zealand law allows a company to carry-forward its tax losses to offset against profits in future years only if its shareholding remains the same, at least to the extent of 49%. This rule will be reformed to allow a company to carry-forward its tax losses even if its ownership has changed so long as its business remains "of a same or similar nature". The new test is expected to closely follow Australia's "same or similar business" test.

The details of the new test have yet to be finalised and amending legislation is not expected to be introduced for some months yet. But once enacted, the test should apply from the current income year. This should allow companies needing to bring in investors in the interim to do so while preserving their tax losses (in reliance on the same or similar business test) where losses would otherwise have been forfeited under the continuity of ownership test.

The reforms can also be expected to affect market standard documentation for business acquisitions. For example, if the parties agree commercially that the tax losses being sold have value and this is reflected in the purchase price, the purchaser will expect to have coverage for such tax losses under the tax indemnity. Existing New Zealand share sale agreements may not provide for this, given they will be drafted on the assumption that tax losses will be forfeited on sale of the shares in a company.

Flexibility to extend deadlines and timeframes (enacted)

A new discretionary power will allow Inland Revenue to vary the application of a provision in an Inland Revenue Act by extending due dates and timeframes or by modifying procedural requirements. The power will be time-limited for a period of 18 months. It is expected that the power could, for example, allow Inland Revenue to extend deadlines for filing tax returns and paying provisional and terminal tax.

A mix of temporary measures and longer-term reforms

The latest announcements follow a series of announcements made in March and enacted under urgency on March 25 2020 in the COVID-19 Response (Taxation and Social Assistance Urgent Measures) Act 2020. That earlier series of measures included:

(a) Reinstating depreciation deductions for non-residential buildings;

(b) Increasing the low-value asset write-off threshold from NZ$500 (US$300) to NZ$5,000 if the item of property was acquired on or after March 17 2020, with the threshold for items of property acquired on or after March 17 2021 being NZ$1,000; and

(c) Bringing forward the application date for certain changes intended to broaden the eligibility criteria for a refund of a research and development (R&D) tax credit to the 2019-20 income year.

The fact that New Zealand's tax policy response to COVID-19 has included a mix of temporary measures and permanent reforms suggests the government is looking to balance the need for immediate flexibility and support for business with the importance of maintaining a tax system underpinned by sound tax policy principles. The reforms affecting tax losses and increased deductions under the depreciation rules should also help to remove barriers to businesses bringing in investors and investing in long-term assets, both of which will be essential elements of the future economic recovery.

Brendan Brown

T: +64 4 819 7748


Matt Woolley

T: +64 4 819 7303


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

KPMG has exclusive access to the tool for three years in the UK, giving it an edge over ‘big four’ rivals
But the US tax agency’s advice is consistent with OECD guidance and shouldn’t surprise anyone, other experts tell ITR
A survey of more than 25,000 in-house counsel reveals that diversity initiatives are a high priority when choosing external counsel
The report is aimed at helping 'low-capacity countries', the OECD has claimed
The UK tax agency appears to be going after easier, lower value targets, one lawyer has claimed
Criminal experts have told ITR that the case of Ulf Johannemann emphasises the fine line between tax avoidance and tax evasion
The ATO workers were among nearly 57,000 people who were duped into claiming fake GST refunds, while Kuwait signed a double taxation treaty with the UAE
However, ICAP may not provide the legal certainty of an APA and tax authorities will have limited capacity, experts argue
ITR+ has launched the Talent Tracker, an interactive database that collates reported partner moves across the legal tax market
The tool is available to more than 2,000 PwC tax professionals and is designed to boost client service
Gift this article