International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New stamp duty exemption foreseen in regard to cash pooling in Portugal

Sponsored by

cuatrecasas-logo-vector.png
Cash-pooling arrangements should increasingly become the preferred way to manage the treasury

As the final version of the State Budget Law for 2020 has finally been approved, Diogo Ortigão Ramos and João Pedro Russo of Cuatrecasas explain the changes made to stamp duty on the taxation cash pooling mechanisms.

Recently approved, the Portuguese State Budget Law for 2020 (the State Budget) introduced some changes to the stamp duty (SD) code. It foresees, among other minor amendments and clarifications, for a new exemption specifically applicable to cash pooling arrangements (i.e., arrangements in which two or more companies comprising a group, the participants, agree on the centralisation of their treasury management functions with a third party, usually a bank, which will be in charge of balancing the accounts of each entity in the cash pool).

Indeed, the State Budget introduces a new exemption applicable to any loans with a maturity period of up to one year and granted within a cash pooling arrangement, provided that, among the participants, there is a dominant or group relationship, defined by the SD Code as a relationship in place between (i) a parent company and the subsidiaries in which the former entity owns, directly or indirectly, a minimum shareholding percentage of at least 75% of share capital and 50% voting rights, and (ii) the same subsidiaries themselves.



By introducing this new exemption with respect to cash pooling arrangements, the lawmaker seems to have struck a compromising balance between the need to ensure taxable income at the level of SD and the need to not fiscally burden Portuguese companies’ treasury functions. 



Pursuant to these changes, cash pooling arrangements deserve a fresh new look by corporate groups seeking for a tax efficient solution addressing their treasury needs, overcoming the uncertainty that still exists around the Portuguese tax authorities’ conservative approach to the tax treatment applicable to the provision of short-term loans. In a nutshell, this new exemption should be seen as good news to all stakeholders, as it will allow for greater levels of security in intra-group financing arrangements. Cash-pooling arrangements should increasingly become the preferred way to manage the treasury needs of corporate groups. 



Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to make sure that such arrangements are properly drafted and implemented, and that they are coherently aligned and compliant with the group’s transfer pricing policies.





Diogo Ortigão Ramos

T: +351 21 355 38 00

E: dortigaoramos@cuatrecasas.com



João Pedro Russo

T: +351 21 355 38 00

E: joao.russo@cuatrecasas.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

PwC publishes detailed accounts of its behaviour in the tax scandal in Australia, while another tax trial looms for pop star Shakira.
The winners of the ITR Europe, Middle East, and Africa Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
The winners of the ITR Asia-Pacific Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
Mauro Faggion appeared cautiously optimistic as the European Commission waits to see whether all 27 member states will accept its proposal.
The global minimum rate also won’t entirely stop a race to the bottom, according to a tax director speaking at an ITR conference in London.
The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.