International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Digital services tax, technological assessments and data protection

Sponsored by

The complexity of digital tax continues to grow.

Sandra Benedetto and Jonatan Israel of PwC Chile explore the continuing clash between technological innovation, data protection and legal regulation in Chile.

In the context of the new digital services VAT provisions (DST) contained within the Chilean tax reform bill currently under discussion in Chilean Congress (the Bill), there are certain aspects that raise questions regarding the interaction between personal data, how its protection is regulated in Chile, and the manner in which the Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will be using taxpayers’ data in its assessment.

To put the discussion in context, it is relevant to note that Chilean VAT applies to certain services that are rendered or utilised in Chile. In the case of services rendered digitally, the Bill proposes to add new connection factors to determine whether a service rendered digitally is utilised in Chile (hence when the new VAT on DST will apply), and it does so in the manner of legal assumptions.

A service rendered digitally is presumed to be utilised in Chile if two of the following four situations occur together: (i) the Internet Protocol (IP) address of the device utilised by the user or other geolocation mechanism indicate the user is in Chile; (ii) the bank card, current account or any other means of payment used for the payment is issued or registered in Chile; (iii) the address stated by the user for invoicing or payment vouchers is located in Chile; (iv) that the subscriber identity module (SIM) of the mobile phone through which the service is received has a Chilean code.

Besides the above, the Bill proposes that the Chilean IRS will be enabled to use all technological means available to verify the tax compliance of this new VAT law provision. This is a very broad provision; however, we deem that user profiling, automated assessments and decisions, may be under analysis by Chilean authorities given the international context.

As it becomes evident, the Chilean IRS is being granted two very important tools by the Bill: firstly, access to a massive amount of personal data to perform tax assessments in what respects to VAT compliance; and, it is given free rein to apply technological tools to perform its assessment. These two aspects raise concerns about the level of protection that such data (and its owners) have in Chile. In this case, there is little doubt that Chilean data privacy law no. 19.628 (the law entitled the ‘Protection of Private Life’) is highly insufficient and outdated to protect individual rights to data privacy against the legitimate state interest to collect taxes.

The clash between the protection of personal data and the public interest is not well developed in the Chilean Protection of Private Life law. Indeed, they are set in a mostly unregulated grey-area that is in dire need of further revision. The sole reference for public sector data management and analysis is that such a law states that personal data processing can be done only when the law permits it, setting very few limitations. This approach is more developed in Europe. In particular, the example of the GDPR, which states that data processing can be performed by states if there is public interest, however it must be limited by the application of the proportionality test, which results in more advanced solutions that duly address this clash of rights. These regulations, which have users’ privacy within its goals, do not forget the relevance of data in the effective tax assessment by the authorities. 

There is currently a bill held-up in Congress (since 2018) that addresses some of these conflict areas. When we do have new data protection provisions or laws, we will need to address challenges derived from such, in particular in regard to tax matters, as tax assessments are becoming ever more digitalised and data-centric.

There is no stopping the implementation of different kinds of digital taxes globally. Data protection regulations, as well as other areas of technological development and the law continue to overlap, meaning that the changes that technology and digitalisation bring to taxation will need to be monitored very closely.

Jonatan Israel

T: +56 2 29400126


Sandra Benedetto

T: +56 2 29400155


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Two months since EU political agreement on pillar two and few member states have made progress on new national laws, but the arrival of OECD technical guidance should quicken the pace. Ralph Cunningham reports.
It’s one of the great ironies of recent history that a populist Republican may have helped make international tax policy more progressive.
Lawmakers have up to 120 days to decide the future of Brazil’s unique transfer pricing rules, but many taxpayers are wary of radical change.
Shell reports profits of £32.2 billion, prompting calls for higher taxes on energy companies, while the IMF warns Australia to raise taxes to sustain public spending.
Governments now have the final OECD guidance on how to implement the 15% global minimum corporate tax rate.
The Indian company, which is contesting the bill, has a family connection to UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak – whose government has just been hit by a tax scandal.
Developments included calls for tax reform in Malaysia and the US, concerns about the level of the VAT threshold in the UK, Ukraine’s preparations for EU accession, and more.
A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.