International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bad debt procedures set to evolve in Romania

Sponsored by

Bad debts have remained a concern for Romanian businesses.

Alex Milcev and Costin Manta of EY Romania assess how companies can ensure that VAT related to bad debts are recovered.

Bad debts are a source of stress for companies. Besides the risk of losing revenue, bad debts also have a tax impact on the creditors, which is not negligible.

Based on VAT principles, VAT should be paid by the supplier to tax authorities at the moment of supply, even if it was not paid by the beneficiary to the supplier (e.g. the invoice is payable within 90 days). 

But what happens when the beneficiary has financial difficulties and is unable to pay the invoice, even after the due date? Romania and other Eastern European countries are not so generous when it comes to VAT on bad debts, when compared to western countries. In Romania, for example, a company can recover the output VAT paid to the tax authorities if its client enters bankruptcy or the receivable was reduced during the client’s insolvency proceedings. The process can take years, meanwhile the supplier has blocked its cash in VAT paid to the tax authorities. Countries such as the UK have a more relaxed regime, allowing companies to recover the VAT paid to the tax authorities if the client did not pay the invoice within 6 months as of the due date. 

The European Court of Justice analysed multiple cases during recent years related to VAT on bad debt and, thankfully, clarified the VAT treatment (e.g. C-246/16 Enzo di Maura, C-242/18 Unicredit Leasing). In both cases, taxable persons face difficulties in recovering the receivables from clients for very long periods of time (approximately 10 years), having to pre-finance the VAT. The conclusions of the European Court of Justice do not leave any doubt: taxable persons may recover the VAT paid to the tax authorities related to receivables which have a reasonable degree of uncertainty of being cashed. The suppliers are not liable to finance the tax authorities with the VAT which was not paid by the clients, Also, the court provides that the supplier is required to pay back the recovered VAT if the clients eventually pay the invoice. 

Based on the Treaty of Accession to the EU, as well as the provisions of the Romanian tax law, Romania should obey the decisions of the European Court of Justice. Thus, when compared to the above-mentioned case law, the Romanian VAT legislation raises some question marks.

But what can companies do about this issue? There are solutions: currently there are multiple administrative and court proceedings for the recovery of VAT related to bad debts. Even solely on the provisions of the Romanian tax law, without involving the court, companies can recover the VAT related to bad debts under specific conditions. However, there are no specific guidelines in case the bad debts were sold, often for a very low price, which is a frequent situation. Even in this case though, there are solutions to recover the VAT.

Based on the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice, ideally the Romanian VAT legislation will soften the conditions for recovering the VAT related to bad debts and this may happen in the next years. Meanwhile, companies can still take steps to recover this VAT themselves.

Alex Milcev


Costin Manta


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.
The solution to address the tax challenges arising from digitalisation and globalisation will generate more revenue than previously estimated.