Bad debt procedures set to evolve in Romania
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bad debt procedures set to evolve in Romania

Sponsored by

Bad debts have remained a concern for Romanian businesses.

Alex Milcev and Costin Manta of EY Romania assess how companies can ensure that VAT related to bad debts are recovered.

Bad debts are a source of stress for companies. Besides the risk of losing revenue, bad debts also have a tax impact on the creditors, which is not negligible.

Based on VAT principles, VAT should be paid by the supplier to tax authorities at the moment of supply, even if it was not paid by the beneficiary to the supplier (e.g. the invoice is payable within 90 days). 

But what happens when the beneficiary has financial difficulties and is unable to pay the invoice, even after the due date? Romania and other Eastern European countries are not so generous when it comes to VAT on bad debts, when compared to western countries. In Romania, for example, a company can recover the output VAT paid to the tax authorities if its client enters bankruptcy or the receivable was reduced during the client’s insolvency proceedings. The process can take years, meanwhile the supplier has blocked its cash in VAT paid to the tax authorities. Countries such as the UK have a more relaxed regime, allowing companies to recover the VAT paid to the tax authorities if the client did not pay the invoice within 6 months as of the due date. 

The European Court of Justice analysed multiple cases during recent years related to VAT on bad debt and, thankfully, clarified the VAT treatment (e.g. C-246/16 Enzo di Maura, C-242/18 Unicredit Leasing). In both cases, taxable persons face difficulties in recovering the receivables from clients for very long periods of time (approximately 10 years), having to pre-finance the VAT. The conclusions of the European Court of Justice do not leave any doubt: taxable persons may recover the VAT paid to the tax authorities related to receivables which have a reasonable degree of uncertainty of being cashed. The suppliers are not liable to finance the tax authorities with the VAT which was not paid by the clients, Also, the court provides that the supplier is required to pay back the recovered VAT if the clients eventually pay the invoice. 

Based on the Treaty of Accession to the EU, as well as the provisions of the Romanian tax law, Romania should obey the decisions of the European Court of Justice. Thus, when compared to the above-mentioned case law, the Romanian VAT legislation raises some question marks.

But what can companies do about this issue? There are solutions: currently there are multiple administrative and court proceedings for the recovery of VAT related to bad debts. Even solely on the provisions of the Romanian tax law, without involving the court, companies can recover the VAT related to bad debts under specific conditions. However, there are no specific guidelines in case the bad debts were sold, often for a very low price, which is a frequent situation. Even in this case though, there are solutions to recover the VAT.

Based on the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice, ideally the Romanian VAT legislation will soften the conditions for recovering the VAT related to bad debts and this may happen in the next years. Meanwhile, companies can still take steps to recover this VAT themselves.

Alex Milcev


Costin Manta


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
The new, fully integrated office will also offer M&A, dispute resolution, IP and corporate tax services
The new guidance concerns a recent 1% excise tax on the repurchases of corporate stock for both US and certain foreign companies
Interpath has hired a managing partner from rival accounting firm BDO to lead the new operation
Survey results of over 28,000 in-house lawyers reveal that American in-house counsel place a higher value on the reputation of external advisers than their peers elsewhere
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Andrew Leigh also endorsed new legislation designed to prevent multinationals using complex corporate structures to reduce taxes
Nick Crama and Parwesh Bissumbhar, senior director and manager respectively at Alvarez & Marsal, outline practical advice for real estate managers to comply with DAC6 regulations
Gift this article