Cryptocurrency transactions fall on to the Brazilian Federal Revenue’s radar

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cryptocurrency transactions fall on to the Brazilian Federal Revenue’s radar

Sponsored by

pinheirologo.png
1e1d81ed-c359-4e45-a5e5-0304b912e60c19-digital-economy-we-need-to-talk-about-platforms.jpg

Ricardo Luiz Becker and Fabio Tarandach of Pinheiro Neto explore how tax authorities are quickly evolving to regulate Brazil’s surging cryptocurrency market.

Just like several countries across the world, cryptocurrency transactions in Brazil have become increasingly important day by day. Whether as a new form of payment (as a substitute to the conventional payment types such as cash or cards), or whether as a form of investment (given the valuation of the cryptocurrency unit), the fact is that cryptocurrency transactions have grown to earn relevance in the Brazilian market.

Brazilian tax law has no legal specific act concerning the taxation of cryptocurrency operations, so transactions involving virtual currencies are currently subject to the same taxation as transactions with different classes of assets. The taxation will follow the set guidelines: (1) the revenue obtained with the settlement in cryptocurrency should be regularly taxed; (2) an entity that settles an obligation with the use of cryptocurrencies should withhold the applicable taxes; and (3) the capital gains earned with the sale of cryptocurrency should be taxed as well.




Nevertheless, until a few months ago, there was no rule foreseeing how these transactions should be brought to the attention of the authorities. Thus in practical terms, the Federal Revenue did not have the resources or tools to collect taxes over these transactions. Since cryptocurrency transactions were becoming more valuable, the Brazilian Federal Revenue (RFB) chose not to ignore this situation.



In this sense, the RFB issued the Normative Instruction Nº 1,888/19 (IN 1,888/19) which determines that all cryptocurrency transactions are properly informed to the authorities by Brazilian exchange brokerage firms (exchanges), by individuals or legal entities owning the crypto assets, depending on the case. 



There are many reporting requirements established under IN 1,888/19, such as date and number of encrypted transactions; description of individuals or companies that were parts in the transaction; type of cryptocurrency transferred; operation’s value; value of the service fees; and address of the delivery and receipt wallet. Moreover, a penalty of 3% is foreseen in cases in which the information provided to the authorities is inaccurate, incomplete or incorrect.



In our view, the new obligations (IN 1,888/19) bring a new perspective to Brazilian public finance and a new scenario to all the players of this market. In accordance to the last information provided by the RFB, in the first two months that the new rule has been in force, the total amount informed to the authorities was around BRL 14 billion. In other words, if the Brazilian tax authorities intend to keep up with controlling cryptocurrency transactions, and tax it, there will be a free way ahead.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article