The Brazilian Federal Revenue Service issues relevant PIS and COFINS regulation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Brazilian Federal Revenue Service issues relevant PIS and COFINS regulation

Sponsored by

logo.png
The new instructions concern the imports of goods and services

Ricardo Marletti Debatin da Silveira and Gabriel Caldiron Rezende of Machado Associados explain how the Brazilian Federal Revenue Service has issued a very important PIS and COFINS regulation, compiling one normative instruction rules from several laws.

The Brazilian Federal Revenue Service (RFB) issued Normative Instruction No. (IN) 1,911/2019, published on October 15 2019, to govern the calculation, collection, inspection, and administration of the social contributions on gross revenues (PIS and COFINS) and social contributions on imports of goods and services (PIS-Import and COFINS-Import).



It is worth noting that it is very difficult to correctly apply the PIS, COFINS, PIS-Import and COFINS-Import rules, as such taxes are governed by numerous laws and have undergone several changes over the past years, providing a set of various differentiated tax treatments depending on the taxpayer’s activity and/or the product sold or imported. 



To this effect, IN 1,911/2019 not only reproduces the wording of several laws, but also addresses matters previously addressed in 53 other normative instructions, which have since been revoked.



As a normative instruction is a regulatory act issued by the RFB, its legal goal would be to only regulate the application of a law; thus, it may neither innovate nor set forth new rules. In this regard, at a certain level, the normative instruction in matter complies with such goals, and compiles legal rules from several laws about the above-mentioned taxes, which comes as a positive development.



Also, to avoid legal controversies, IN 1,911/2019 makes important clarifications regarding the concept of inputs for the purpose of non-cumulative credits for these taxes. As previously mentioned, this remains a highly controversial matter. After a very important decision from the Superior Court of Justice – that established the legal concept of input – the RFB issued clarifications on the matter through Normative Opinion 5/2018.



In line with Normative Opinion 5/2018, IN 1,911/2019 applies a broad concept of input for credit purposes, granting more legal certainty to taxpayers, as the RFB is bound to its normative instructions. Nevertheless, IN 1,911/2019 still maintains some controversial matters on the concept of inputs, as already stated in the Normative Opinion.



Controversies aside, IN 1,911/2019 shows the Federal Government a good intention of rationalising the several complex PIS, COFINS, PIS-Import and COFINS-Import rules, and compiling them into one piece.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
Sponsored by Deloitte
Sameer Nurmohamed, partner, Deloitte Legal Canada
Sponsored by Deloitte
George Ankomah, partner, Tax & Regulatory Services, Deloitte Africa (Ghana)
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Sponsored by Deloitte Luxembourg
Jean-Michel Henry and Mona El-Begawi of Deloitte Luxembourg examine the complexities created by timing differences in Luxembourg, EU, and OECD tax regimes
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Sponsored by MFA Legal & Tech
Samuel Fernandes de Almeida of MFA Legal & Tech assesses whether Portugal’s 7.5% surcharge on non-residents aligns with the EU’s free movement of capital principle and passes the proportionality test
Sponsored by McCarthy Tétrault
Senior McCarthy Tétrault tax practitioners highlight significant updates and implications for multinationals as Canada’s transfer pricing rules become more closely aligned with OECD guidance
Gift this article