New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
A series of important changes are imminent

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners consider the impact of the innovative provisions brought forward by October 2019’s law decree.

The Law Decree no. 124 of October 26 2019 (published in the Italian Official Gazette no. 252 dated October 26 2019), has set out a number of new tax provisions. The new provisions are immediately effective, but will have to be converted into law by the Italian Parliament by December 25 2019 to become final.

Prohibition on the set-off of tax credits in the event of tax debt assumption 


The previous tax codes had provided for the assumption of third party tax debts without exempting the original tax debtor from tax liability. The tax decree amends the law and sets forth that the party who assumes the debt is excluded from the use of its own tax credits to offset the due payments.



Limit for set-off credits – exceeds €5,000 

The new provisions widen the existing rules concerning the set-off payments in respect to VAT credits by extending it to encompass other types of taxes such as direct and substitute. Credits in regard to direct taxes exceeding €5,000 can be used as set-off payments only after the tenth day following the filing of the income tax return or the request from which such tax credit emerges. 



Tax evasion criminal thresholds 

The new decree imposes stricter penalties and lower criminal thresholds for tax evasion. For the offence of filing a false tax return, the amount for the potential evaded tax has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000), while the under-declared taxable base has been cut to €2 million (from €3 million). Meanwhile, the criminalisation threshold for withholding taxes resulting from a tax return or a certificate has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000); and for failing to pay VAT is reduced to €150,000 (from €250,000). Furthermore, the provision that had previously excluded the criminalisation of evaluations that differ by less than 10% from the correct amount has been repealed.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
World Tax data shows Matt Donnelly is moving from a Tier 3 transactional tax practice to a Tier 1 market leader, underlining Kirkland & Ellis’s pull at the top end of the market
Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Advisers won’t be short of work in a world of increased valuation disputes, documentation requirements and behavioural responses from clients seeking to protect their wealth
Jaydeep Menon explains how Frazier & Deeter built a specialist practice which helps UK start-ups expand into the US and why private equity backing is accelerating its ambitions
As joint audits, data sharing and pillar two reshape tax controversy, multinational groups can no longer afford to manage disputes one jurisdiction at a time
Brazil's tax system is being reshaped by VAT , pillar two and TP reform. Fallet explains why those changes convinced him to lead a new practice
Gift this article