New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Italian tax decree imposes stricter evasion penalties

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-hager.png
A series of important changes are imminent

Gian Luca Nieddu and Barbara Scampuddu of Hager & Partners consider the impact of the innovative provisions brought forward by October 2019’s law decree.

The Law Decree no. 124 of October 26 2019 (published in the Italian Official Gazette no. 252 dated October 26 2019), has set out a number of new tax provisions. The new provisions are immediately effective, but will have to be converted into law by the Italian Parliament by December 25 2019 to become final.

Prohibition on the set-off of tax credits in the event of tax debt assumption 


The previous tax codes had provided for the assumption of third party tax debts without exempting the original tax debtor from tax liability. The tax decree amends the law and sets forth that the party who assumes the debt is excluded from the use of its own tax credits to offset the due payments.



Limit for set-off credits – exceeds €5,000 

The new provisions widen the existing rules concerning the set-off payments in respect to VAT credits by extending it to encompass other types of taxes such as direct and substitute. Credits in regard to direct taxes exceeding €5,000 can be used as set-off payments only after the tenth day following the filing of the income tax return or the request from which such tax credit emerges. 



Tax evasion criminal thresholds 

The new decree imposes stricter penalties and lower criminal thresholds for tax evasion. For the offence of filing a false tax return, the amount for the potential evaded tax has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000), while the under-declared taxable base has been cut to €2 million (from €3 million). Meanwhile, the criminalisation threshold for withholding taxes resulting from a tax return or a certificate has been reduced to €100,000 (from €150,000); and for failing to pay VAT is reduced to €150,000 (from €250,000). Furthermore, the provision that had previously excluded the criminalisation of evaluations that differ by less than 10% from the correct amount has been repealed.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article