New Zealand: New Zealand government updates tax reform priorities
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand: New Zealand government updates tax reform priorities

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
ib-new-zealand.jpg

The New Zealand government has updated its short to medium-term priorities for tax reform by releasing a “refreshed” Tax Policy Work Programme (work programme).

The New Zealand government has updated its short to medium-term priorities for tax reform by releasing a "refreshed" Tax Policy Work Programme (work programme). While the government has retained many of its existing tax reform priorities, new priorities include a possible tax incentive for investment in nationally-significant infrastructure, and "enhancing economic performance" through business-related tax reform. In announcing the work programme, the minister of revenue stated: "Tax policy has a big role to play to encourage productivity and growth."

A tax incentive for nationally-significant infrastructure?

The tax working group, set up by the New Zealand government to make recommendations on the fairness, balance and structure of the tax system, recommended earlier this year that the government "consider developing a regime that encourages investment into nationally-significant infrastructure projects". Addressing infrastructure issues has been a priority for the government, with a new independent commission recently established to "enable coordination of infrastructure planning and provide advice and best practice support to infrastructure initiatives".

The tax working group's recommendation was in response to a proposal that investors pay a concessionary rate of 14% (i.e. half the current company tax rate) on profits made in New Zealand from qualifying infrastructure projects. Under that proposal, qualifying investors would need to have "demonstrated capability to deliver world-class infrastructure projects" and "would also need to bring expertise that is not ordinarily available in New Zealand and commit that expertise to the delivery of the infrastructure".

Enhancing economic performance through business tax reform

The minister of revenue stated that a "key workstream" of the updated work programme focuses on "minimising compliance cost for businesses; and lifting the economic performance of all businesses, especially smaller firms and the self-employed". While the government has not listed specific tax reform measures that it will progress as part of that workstream, it has already announced that it will "change New Zealand's 'loss continuity rules' to make it easier for start-ups to attract investment and get off the ground".

Under the law, a company's tax losses are forfeited if there is a more than 51% change in the ownership of the company from when the tax loss arose. As a result, when companies raise capital to fund growth and other requirements, the shareholder continuity requirement may be breached and tax losses forfeited. Other countries have addressed this impediment to businesses raising the capital they need to grow by allowing losses to be carried forward if the company's business remains the same or similar.

The government has also announced reform to allow deductions for "feasibility expenditure", being "costs associated with exploring whether to invest in a new asset or business model..., including for projects that don't end up going ahead". Under current law, such expenditure may be at risk of not being deductible when incurred (because it is capital in nature) and also not qualifying as part of the cost base of a depreciable asset (because it is too preliminary to relate to a particular asset, or because the relevant project does not proceed).

Implementation of the work programme

The tax law reform process in New Zealand ordinarily involves public consultation prior to the government making a decision on whether to progress with a reform. Given the time required for policy development and consultation, the government will need to move quickly if it is to start implementing its new reform priorities before the next general election (which in the ordinary course would be expected in late 2020).

Russell McVeagh

T: +64 4 819 7748 and +64 4 819 7303

E: brendan.brown@russellmcveagh.com and matt.woolley@russellmcveagh.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New requirements for advisers to inform clients of any relevant matters that might impact their relationship have raised concerns from a raft of professional bodies
The fallout from PwC China’s Evergrande audit has reportedly hit the firm hard; in other news, the US and Turkey look to reform their corporate tax rates
Canada risks inflaming US trade relations in a presidential election year and increasing costs for consumers, according to local experts
Dudbridge, ForrestBrown director and head of its advisory practice, FB Consulting, tells ITR about the joys of tax advisory work, what he finds most exciting about the role and what makes tax cool
A UK court rejected Tills Plus’s claim for R&D tax credits due to a lack of technological advancement
View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
The announcement is due to be made during the country’s Union Budget statement next week, according to reports
Around 30 roles are to be cut as the firm’s tax controversy and disputes practice will be incorporated into its tax division
The Labour Party has made ambitious commitments to close the UK’s ‘tax gap’, but how can they do it, and what will it mean for business?
The refreshed leadership team does not include Paddy Carney, who previously made headlines for her dual role on PwC Australia’s and PwC International’s boards
Gift this article