International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Colombia reshapes its thin capitalisation rules

Sponsored by

eygreece.png
ib-colombia.jpg

Luis Orlando Sánchez of EY assesses the new thin capitalisation rules in Colombia.

Colombian thin capitalisation rules to limit interest deductibility have been applicable since 2013. The original rules provided a general debt to equity ratio of 3:1. This ratio considered all types of current-year debt, which generated interest, irrespective of whether it was acquired from related or unrelated parties, or from local or foreign creditors. On the other hand, the equity for tax purposes as of December 31 of the prior year were considered for this ratio. Special purpose vehicles (SPVs) engaged in public services' infrastructure projects and financial entities, among others, were not reached by the thin capitalisation rules.

These old rules were subject to several criticisms, such as:

  • The broad reach of debts subject to thin capitalisation;

  • The fact that the ratio compared current year debts with the prior year's equity could trigger a limitation on the interest in cases in which the company has enough equity in the current year to acquire more debt;

  • There was some discussion on whether infrastructure projects related to transportation were subject or not to these rules; and

  • The limited interest in one year could not be carried forward for deduction in future years.

In the last tax reform (Law 1943 of 2018), applicable from 2019, the Colombian government did not take the approach of including an interest limitation based on a percentage of the earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of the company, as recommended by BEPS Action 4, but kept a thin capitalisation rule, with several changes, some addressing the above criticism.

The features of the new thin capitalisation rule include: i) the debt to equity ratio is now 2:1, but only considers related party debt with local or foreign creditors; ii) related party debt includes back-to-back transactions, as well other transactions in which the creditor is, in substance, a related party; iii) a certification of non-related party debt to be issued by the creditor would be required; and iv) it is clarified that the limitations are not applicable to SPVs engaged in infrastructure projects concerning transportation and public services, and for businesses which are in an unproductive stage.

This new rule was recently regulated by Decree 1146 of June 26 2019, providing, among others, the mechanisms for the application and calculation of the thin capitalisation rules, and for the issuance of the non-related party debt certification. In Official Opinion 8159 of April 5 2019, the tax authority mentioned that when the guarantor is not substantially deemed the real creditor the debt should not be considered a related-party debt. Unfortunately, this was not clearly stated in the regulation, and could eventually generate discussion, particularly at the time the certification is issued.

In summary, the new thin capitalisation rule is a development from the prior rule, but still has much room for improvement to make it fairer and economically reasonable. In addition, its application, could mean challenges and potentially the need for further guidance to avoid undesired results. It is important to keep an eye on any developments in the rule. The 2019 tax return (to be filed in 2020) will show its practical benefits and challenges.

EY

E: luis.sanchez.n@co.ey.com

W: www.ey.com/co/es/

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.