US: Sale of a partnership interest: Withholding tax

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US: Sale of a partnership interest: Withholding tax

Sponsored by

fenwick.jpg
us.jpg

The US Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have proposed withholding tax regulations regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions, addressing sales of interests in partnerships engaged in the conduct of a US trade or business.

The US Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have proposed withholding tax regulations regarding the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions, addressing sales of interests in partnerships engaged in the conduct of a US trade or business.

Section 1446(f) provides rules for withholding on the transfer of a partnership interest described in § 864(c)(8). Under § 1446(f)(1), the transferee is required to deduct and withhold a tax equal to 10% of the amount realised on the disposition if a portion of the gain on any disposition of an interest in a partnership would be treated under § 864(c)(8), as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the US.

Proposed regulations

The proposed regulations would adopt many of the rules that were described in a previous IRS notice (Notice 2018-29) when finalised, with certain helpful modifications provided partly in response to taxpayers comments.

They also provide reporting rules relating to § 864(c)(8) and contain rules clarifying the reporting rules applicable to transfers of partnership interests subject to § 6050K (concerning the application of § 751).

Furthermore, the proposed regulations provide rules implementing withholding by brokers on the transfer of certain interests in publicly-traded partnerships (PTPs) subject to § 1446(f)(1).

Due to the difficulties involved with requiring brokers to timely determine a transferor's share of partnership liabilities, proposed Treas. Reg. § 1.1446(f)-4(c)(2)(i) provides a special rule that treats the amount realised on the transfer of a PTP interest as the amount of gross proceeds paid or credited to the customer or another broker (as applicable).

Exemptions

Because § 864(c)(8) requires a deemed sale at the partnership level to determine a foreign partner's effectively connected gain or loss, a foreign person that transfers its partnership interest will generally not be able to compute its income tax liability under § 864(c)(8), unless the partnership provides certain information to the foreign partner.

The proposed regulations therefore provide rules to facilitate the transfer of information between a foreign partner and the partnership for purposes of § 864(c)(8). They also provide an exception to withholding under § 1446(f)(1) when a transferor certifies that it is not subject to tax on any gain from the transfer, pursuant to an income tax treaty in effect between the US and a foreign country.

This exception applies only when a transferor (as opposed to owners of an interest in the transferor, including partners in a partnership that is a transferor) qualifies for the benefits of an income tax treaty, in order to reduce the burden on a transferee of reviewing documentation from multiple persons.

When a transferor provides a transferee certain information, proposed Treas. Reg. § 1.1446(f)-2(c)(4)(i) allows the transferee to withhold based on the transferor's maximum tax liability on the transfer. The transferor's maximum tax liability is the amount of the transferor's effectively connected gain multiplied by the applicable percentage. See § 1446(b) and Treas. Reg. § 1.1446-3(a)(2). The applicable percentage applies the highest rate of tax for each particular type of income or gain allocable to a foreign person. This undoubtedly will become very helpful.

Proposed Treas. Reg. § 1.1446(f)-5(b) provides important new rules for the liability of agents, which generally require an agent of a transferor (or transferee) to notify the transferee (or other person required to withhold), if it has knowledge that a certification furnished to that person is false.

A person that receives notice from an agent may not rely on the certification to apply an exception to withholding, or for determining the amount to withhold. Proposed Treas. Reg. § 1.1446(f)-5(b)(2) requires the agent to furnish a copy of the notice to the IRS.

An agent that fails to provide the required notice is liable for the tax that the person (that should have received the notice) would have been required to withhold under § 1446(f). However, this liability is limited to the amount of compensation that the agent derives from the transaction (and any civil or criminal penalties that may apply).

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article