All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Romania: EC pushes Romania to revise statute of limitation on customs debts

Sponsored by

eygreece.png
romania.jpg

Four months after the European Commission (EC) requested Romania to lower its statute of limitation for additional customs liabilities from five years to three years, we have not identified any action from the Romanian authorities to comply with the request.

Four months after the European Commission (EC) requested Romania to lower its statute of limitation for additional customs liabilities from five years to three years, we have not identified any action from the Romanian authorities to comply with the request.

The Romanian customs authority can communicate customs debt to the debtor up to five years after it was incurred, and additional customs debts arising from such audits are calculated using a five-year period, too.

However, this term contravenes the EU Customs Code, which allows national customs authorities only three years to communicate a customs debt, except for cases when a customs debt arises from a criminal act where the period can be extended to 10 years.

If you were subject to a customs audit in Romania in the past that covered debt over a period of four to five years, you may be entitled to a refund for the debt exceeding a three-year period. Leaving aside the last two years in a customs audit usually decreases the overall customs debt by more than 50% given the large impact of late payment interest in the overall amount. Of course, each case has its own merits and has to be properly analysed before formal actions are taken in the process.

Customs audits continue to cover a five-year period, despite the infringement procedure from the EC. If you face a customs audit in Romania which covers more than three years, we recommend acting immediately to adjust the audited period before the audit is formally closed.

We expect the EC to send a reasoned opinion to the Romanian authorities, which is the next step in the infringement procedure. Decreasing the time to communicate a customs debt from five to three years will push the Romanian authorities to act more efficiently in the customs audit process.

We expect this big change will result in the introduction of full electronic customs audits and encourage regular assessments by economic operators based on data supplied by the customs authorities. These results are the fundamentals of mutual trust between the customs authorities and economic operators across the EU.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Energy ministers agreed on regulations including a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies to address high gas prices at an extraordinary Council meeting on September 30.
The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree