Italy: Changes to the TP framework

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Changes to the TP framework

Italy large

On April 24 2017, a new law decree (N. 50/2017) introduced changes to the Italian transfer pricing framework. Antonella Della Rovere and Federico Vicenti from Valente Associati GEB Partners look at the changes.

In a nutshell, the Italian provision on transfer pricing (art. 110 para. 7 of the Italian Income Tax Code) was amended to clearly and definitively encompass the principle of open market conditions.

More specifically, until the above amendment, the relevant provision implied the principle of open market conditions, regulating by reference to other provisions of the Italian Income Tax Code including it (art. 9). Following the recent amendment, the provision explicitly refers to such principle. In particular, according to the amended provision, profit from transactions between Italian enterprises and related foreign enterprises shall be estimated “by reference to the conditions and prices that would have been agreed between subjects operating in open market conditions under comparable circumstances”.

Further guidance on the transfer pricing criteria and methods, in line with the respective OECD Guidelines, is foreseen to be provided by virtue of future ministerial decree.

It arises that the above outlined legislative intervention aimed at:

  • Further aligning the Italian transfer pricing regime with the relevant OECD Guidelines, as updated in 2010, taking into account most recent considerations in the context of the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project;

  • Provide updated guidance at a domestic level as regards the application of the transfer pricing regime. It is worth noting that the latest relevant circular was issued in 1980, following publication of the 1979 OECD Guidelines, introducing the open market conditions’ principle in the context of transfer pricing evaluations and adjustments.

Apart from the above, an additional amendment introduced in Italy by virtue of the same recent legislation refers to transfer pricing adjustments by foreign tax authorities. It focuses on adjustments to the taxable base of foreign enterprises related to Italian ones and involved in transactions therewith implying decrease of the Italian taxable base. The amendment seeks to allow adjustment in Italy without activation of mutual agreement procedures (MAP).

Consequently, in case of such adjustment, the corresponding decrease of the taxable income of the Italian enterprise may be recognized either through the (traditional) MAP or in one of the following ways:

  • With the conclusion of audits effected in the context of international cooperation which outcomes are to be shared among the cooperating states

  • Following application of the taxpayer in case the adjustment is definitive, in accordance with the arm’s-length principle and leading to increase of the taxable base in a foreign jurisdiction. It is a precondition that a convention for the avoidance of double taxation (DTA) is in effect between Italy and such foreign jurisdiction, providing for exchange of information.

Before the amendment, decrease of the taxable base in Italy following transfer pricing adjustment by foreign jurisdiction was allowed only in case of agreement with the foreign competent authorities in the context of MAP under applicable DTA.

The amendment aims at warranting to multinational corporations elimination of double taxation in case of transfer pricing adjustments, regardless of MAP (as per art. 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention). Such guarantees are particularly important in view of the ongoing revision of MAP in the context of the BEPS project.

Antonella Della Rovere

Antonella Della Rovere
Valente Associati GEB Partners
a.dellarovere@gebnetwork.it

 

Federico Vincenti

Federico Vincenti
Valente Associati GEB Partners
f.vincenti@gebnetwork.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article