Italy: Changes to the TP framework
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: Changes to the TP framework

Italy large

On April 24 2017, a new law decree (N. 50/2017) introduced changes to the Italian transfer pricing framework. Antonella Della Rovere and Federico Vicenti from Valente Associati GEB Partners look at the changes.

In a nutshell, the Italian provision on transfer pricing (art. 110 para. 7 of the Italian Income Tax Code) was amended to clearly and definitively encompass the principle of open market conditions.

More specifically, until the above amendment, the relevant provision implied the principle of open market conditions, regulating by reference to other provisions of the Italian Income Tax Code including it (art. 9). Following the recent amendment, the provision explicitly refers to such principle. In particular, according to the amended provision, profit from transactions between Italian enterprises and related foreign enterprises shall be estimated “by reference to the conditions and prices that would have been agreed between subjects operating in open market conditions under comparable circumstances”.

Further guidance on the transfer pricing criteria and methods, in line with the respective OECD Guidelines, is foreseen to be provided by virtue of future ministerial decree.

It arises that the above outlined legislative intervention aimed at:

  • Further aligning the Italian transfer pricing regime with the relevant OECD Guidelines, as updated in 2010, taking into account most recent considerations in the context of the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project;

  • Provide updated guidance at a domestic level as regards the application of the transfer pricing regime. It is worth noting that the latest relevant circular was issued in 1980, following publication of the 1979 OECD Guidelines, introducing the open market conditions’ principle in the context of transfer pricing evaluations and adjustments.

Apart from the above, an additional amendment introduced in Italy by virtue of the same recent legislation refers to transfer pricing adjustments by foreign tax authorities. It focuses on adjustments to the taxable base of foreign enterprises related to Italian ones and involved in transactions therewith implying decrease of the Italian taxable base. The amendment seeks to allow adjustment in Italy without activation of mutual agreement procedures (MAP).

Consequently, in case of such adjustment, the corresponding decrease of the taxable income of the Italian enterprise may be recognized either through the (traditional) MAP or in one of the following ways:

  • With the conclusion of audits effected in the context of international cooperation which outcomes are to be shared among the cooperating states

  • Following application of the taxpayer in case the adjustment is definitive, in accordance with the arm’s-length principle and leading to increase of the taxable base in a foreign jurisdiction. It is a precondition that a convention for the avoidance of double taxation (DTA) is in effect between Italy and such foreign jurisdiction, providing for exchange of information.

Before the amendment, decrease of the taxable base in Italy following transfer pricing adjustment by foreign jurisdiction was allowed only in case of agreement with the foreign competent authorities in the context of MAP under applicable DTA.

The amendment aims at warranting to multinational corporations elimination of double taxation in case of transfer pricing adjustments, regardless of MAP (as per art. 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention). Such guarantees are particularly important in view of the ongoing revision of MAP in the context of the BEPS project.

Antonella Della Rovere

Antonella Della Rovere
Valente Associati GEB Partners
a.dellarovere@gebnetwork.it

 

Federico Vincenti

Federico Vincenti
Valente Associati GEB Partners
f.vincenti@gebnetwork.it

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm picked up awards for its work in multiple jurisdictions, while DLA Piper walked away with four individual honours
On a panel of advisers and tax authority representatives from a range of European jurisdictions, financial transactions were pinpointed as a key TP audit focus
ITR concludes its World Tax rankings analyses with APAC, where India’s dynamism stood out in an otherwise stable region
Jim Chalmers’ opposite number also criticised the embattled firm, but argued that the government’s response to the tax leaks scandal had gone too far
The firm’s new Asia-Pacific head James Badenach tells ITR that A&M Tax can provide an alternative in the region to a “constrained” ‘big four’
As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Gift this article