Luxembourg’s deadline for CbCR is fast approaching

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Luxembourg’s deadline for CbCR is fast approaching

Luxembourg bridge large

Marc Rasch, TP partner at PwC Luxembourg, provides an update on the scope of country-by-country reporting requirements as the deadline looms.

All OECD and G20 countries have committed to implementing country by country reporting (CbCR). Luxembourg, among other countries, has agreed that implementing CbCR is a key priority in addressing BEPS risks. Reporting takes place with respect to fiscal periods commencing from January 1 2016 and electronic notifications are due by March 31 2017. The time is now.  

Who falls into the scope of CbCR?

Any Luxembourg tax resident must file a notification with the Luxembourg tax authorities. Falling into the scope are:

  • Any tax resident that is part of a multinational enterprise group with a consolidated group revenue (i.e. chiffre d’affaires total consolidé) of €750 million ($815 million) or more in the preceding fiscal year (i.e. fiscal year 2015 for the first applicable year 2016); and

  • For which either a Luxembourg tax resident or other entity of the multinational enterprise group prepares consolidated financial statements, or would be required to do so if its equity interests were traded on a public securities exchange.

Yet, there are still a lot of questions on the exact scope and application of the CbCR.

For instance, does Luxembourg’s CbCR law require investment funds to file CbCR as ultimate parent entities (UPE) considering that under the accounting rules they are not included in the scope of consolidation? Similarly, for Luxembourg holding companies under private equity funds that are applying the consolidation exemption under Luxembourg GAAP and IFRS, are such entities considered as constituent entities and therefore may be considered an UPE of an MNE group and file a CbCR?

We think that no notification and filing should be required from a Luxembourg perspective. This and other questions have been addressed with the tax directorate and we hope to receive further guidance soon,” said Marc Rasch, transfer pricing partner at PwC Luxembourg.

Beware of penalties

For fiscal year ending on December 31 2016, the first deadline of notification is due by March 31 2017. Absence, incomplete or inaccurate filing of an electronic notification may result in potential penalties up to €250,000.

The notification has to be filed electronically for each Luxembourg resident separately that falls in the scope of the CbCR. Yet, the CbCR has to be filed with the ultimate parent or a surrogate parent entity, where applicable, as of December 31 2017.



By Marc Rasch, PwC Luxembourg

Marc Rasch

Marc Rasch
Transfer pricing partner, PwC

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Over two-thirds of survey respondents back the continuation of the UK’s digital services tax, research commissioned by the Fair Tax Foundation also found
Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Rishi Joshi, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, warns of potential judicial overreach as assets are recharacterised to bypass a legislative exclusion
Only 2% of in-house survey respondents said they were ‘heavy’ users of AI for TP, Aibidia’s report also found
There was a ‘deeply embedded culture within PwC that routinely disregarded formal confidentiality obligations,’ the chairman of Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board said
Jennifer Best was most recently the acting commissioner of the IRS’s large business and international division
Gift this article