Brexit: UK's Supreme Court to hear arguments in December

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brexit: UK's Supreme Court to hear arguments in December

Supreme Court

The UK’s highest court will convene on December 5 to hear the government's arguments against allowing MPs to vote on triggering Brexit. Debate over the best way to exit the European Union has multiple implications for tax and transfer pricing.

The UK's 11 Supreme Court justices will begin hearing four days of arguments starting December 5 to decide whether Parliament should have a say before the UK invokes Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, triggering formal EU withdrawal talks. The court’s ruling is expected to be delivered in 2017.

Prime Minister Theresa May has indicated she expects to start exit talks by the end of March but there has been confusion about whether May has the authority to proceed unilaterally after the High Court ruled last week that Parliament should have a say before the UK invokes Article 50.

The decision on how and when to leave the European Union could have two significant impacts on the transfer pricing environment in the UK: freedom from the relevant EU Directives, and movement of companies or financial and other assets, either into or out of the UK.

Multinationals will need to consider how the changes made during the exit negotiations affect their transfer pricing. In particular, companies will need to examine the impact of the UK no longer being subject to EU Directives and how assets and companies can be moved into, or out of, the UK.

“Depending on market sentiment after a Brexit, relative confidence in the UK economy may cause companies to move their assets or operations to or from the UK,” according to corporate finance adviser Duff & Phelps.

The transfer pricing implications and requirements that could include the following:

  • Debt capacity and interest rate reviews for new investments;

  • Comparison of alternative intellectual property (IP) holding jurisdictions, IP valuation and transfer and royalty rate reviews;

  • Supply chain reviews including risk allocation and centralisation of high value functions; and

  • Resolution of existing transfer pricing audits or litigation.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK has confirmed its approach to the OECD’s side-by-side deal, but US-parented groups may find pillar two compliance remains far from straightforward
Fragmented pillar two taxation and increased use of AI by tax authorities have left clients fearful of heightened disputes exposure
Grant Thornton Advisors’ latest acquisition has produced the fifth-largest US advisory firm by revenue, but there’s still a clear gulf between it and the big four
Crowe joins Grant Thornton, WTS and Ryan in attracting PE investment, suggesting that dealmakers remain bullish on the tax advisory sector
HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Gift this article