Brexit: UK's Supreme Court to hear arguments in December

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brexit: UK's Supreme Court to hear arguments in December

Supreme Court

The UK’s highest court will convene on December 5 to hear the government's arguments against allowing MPs to vote on triggering Brexit. Debate over the best way to exit the European Union has multiple implications for tax and transfer pricing.

The UK's 11 Supreme Court justices will begin hearing four days of arguments starting December 5 to decide whether Parliament should have a say before the UK invokes Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, triggering formal EU withdrawal talks. The court’s ruling is expected to be delivered in 2017.

Prime Minister Theresa May has indicated she expects to start exit talks by the end of March but there has been confusion about whether May has the authority to proceed unilaterally after the High Court ruled last week that Parliament should have a say before the UK invokes Article 50.

The decision on how and when to leave the European Union could have two significant impacts on the transfer pricing environment in the UK: freedom from the relevant EU Directives, and movement of companies or financial and other assets, either into or out of the UK.

Multinationals will need to consider how the changes made during the exit negotiations affect their transfer pricing. In particular, companies will need to examine the impact of the UK no longer being subject to EU Directives and how assets and companies can be moved into, or out of, the UK.

“Depending on market sentiment after a Brexit, relative confidence in the UK economy may cause companies to move their assets or operations to or from the UK,” according to corporate finance adviser Duff & Phelps.

The transfer pricing implications and requirements that could include the following:

  • Debt capacity and interest rate reviews for new investments;

  • Comparison of alternative intellectual property (IP) holding jurisdictions, IP valuation and transfer and royalty rate reviews;

  • Supply chain reviews including risk allocation and centralisation of high value functions; and

  • Resolution of existing transfer pricing audits or litigation.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Gift this article