International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indian government seeks comments on range concept and multiple year data by end of the week

On May 21, the Central Government issued a draft scheme on range concept and use of multiple year data and invited comments and suggestions from stake holders and general public by 31 May 2015.

The draft follows the proposal for introduction of use of multiple year data and the rang’ concept in the Indian Transfer Pricing (TP) Regulations by the Minister in his 2014 budget speech. The salient features of the draft scheme are as follows:

Use of range concept

· The range concept shall be used in case the taxpayer is using transactional net margin method (TNMM), cost plus method (CPM) or resale price method (RPM) with a minimum of nine comparable entities of tested party.

· The draft scheme proposes that if the transfer price falls within the 40th to 60th percentile of the three year weighted average data of each of nine entities (or more), no adjustment shall be made. For calculating the weighted average, the numerator and denominator of the chosen profit level indicator (PLI) would be aggregated for all the years for every comparable entity and the margin would be computed thereafter; and

· If the transfer price falls outside the above range, the median of the range would be taken as arm’s-length price (ALP) and accordingly adjustment shall be made.

Use of multiple year data

· Three multiple years’ data (including the year in which the transaction is undertaken) would be used to determine the ALP in case TNMM, CPM or RPM is used as most appropriate method.

· Usage of multiple years’ data for two years instead of three in case data of current year is not available or a comparable fails the quantitative filter of one year or a comparable may have commenced operations only in the last two years or may have closed down the operations during the current year. The current year data can be used by both the tax officer and the taxpayer at the time of audit if the same is available at that time.

The proposed scheme clarifies that in cases where the range concept does not apply, the arithmetic mean concept and the benefit of tolerance range (as per existing provisions) shall continue to apply with the use of multiple year data.

The Indian government has proposed a range of data points lying within the 40th to 60th percentile of the data set. However, globally the norm is for use of data points within the 25th to 75th percentile. How the stakeholders react to the proposed restriction and the final stand Indian Government will take is something to look out for.

Furthermore, the scheme proposes to limit the application of range concept and use of multiple year data to three methods, namely, TNMM, RPM and CPM. Though the same is a much needed progress towards reducing litigation and compliance challenges for Indian taxpayers, but it is likely to generate debate regarding the possible reasons for not extending the same to profit split method as well as other method.

By Rajeev Jain, Director, Grant Thornton India LLP

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.