Indian government seeks comments on range concept and multiple year data by end of the week

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indian government seeks comments on range concept and multiple year data by end of the week

On May 21, the Central Government issued a draft scheme on range concept and use of multiple year data and invited comments and suggestions from stake holders and general public by 31 May 2015.

The draft follows the proposal for introduction of use of multiple year data and the rang’ concept in the Indian Transfer Pricing (TP) Regulations by the Minister in his 2014 budget speech. The salient features of the draft scheme are as follows:

Use of range concept

· The range concept shall be used in case the taxpayer is using transactional net margin method (TNMM), cost plus method (CPM) or resale price method (RPM) with a minimum of nine comparable entities of tested party.

· The draft scheme proposes that if the transfer price falls within the 40th to 60th percentile of the three year weighted average data of each of nine entities (or more), no adjustment shall be made. For calculating the weighted average, the numerator and denominator of the chosen profit level indicator (PLI) would be aggregated for all the years for every comparable entity and the margin would be computed thereafter; and

· If the transfer price falls outside the above range, the median of the range would be taken as arm’s-length price (ALP) and accordingly adjustment shall be made.

Use of multiple year data

· Three multiple years’ data (including the year in which the transaction is undertaken) would be used to determine the ALP in case TNMM, CPM or RPM is used as most appropriate method.

· Usage of multiple years’ data for two years instead of three in case data of current year is not available or a comparable fails the quantitative filter of one year or a comparable may have commenced operations only in the last two years or may have closed down the operations during the current year. The current year data can be used by both the tax officer and the taxpayer at the time of audit if the same is available at that time.

The proposed scheme clarifies that in cases where the range concept does not apply, the arithmetic mean concept and the benefit of tolerance range (as per existing provisions) shall continue to apply with the use of multiple year data.

The Indian government has proposed a range of data points lying within the 40th to 60th percentile of the data set. However, globally the norm is for use of data points within the 25th to 75th percentile. How the stakeholders react to the proposed restriction and the final stand Indian Government will take is something to look out for.

Furthermore, the scheme proposes to limit the application of range concept and use of multiple year data to three methods, namely, TNMM, RPM and CPM. Though the same is a much needed progress towards reducing litigation and compliance challenges for Indian taxpayers, but it is likely to generate debate regarding the possible reasons for not extending the same to profit split method as well as other method.


By Rajeev Jain, Director, Grant Thornton India LLP

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article