AstraZeneca’s Ian Brimicombe addresses BEPS and US inversion transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AstraZeneca’s Ian Brimicombe addresses BEPS and US inversion transactions

Ian Brimicombe, VP of corporate finance at AstraZeneca, discusses the struggle between regional and global compliance in an interview with TPWeek, and provides his views on topical transfer pricing issues.

Brimicombe has expressed his views on some of the most important transfer pricing issues in the headlines, including concerns over BEPS and country-by-country reporting and the increasing amount of US companies attempting inversion transactions in the UK.

Brimicombe has also spoken in detail with TPWeek about the makeup of AstraZeneca’s tax department, day-to-day transfer pricing issues and the company’s strategy for mitigating tax disputes.

The interview reveals the inner workings of the AstraZeneca tax department including its organisational structure, key objectives and tax dispute strategies.

“Our key objective is to implement domestic and international rules in a compliant way. On occasion it can be a challenge to secure agreements between governments as to how to allocate profits between the various activities located around the world,” Brimicombe said.

Brimicombe also addresses the issue of commercial sensitivity in relation to BEPS documentation requirements and gives an insight into what he thinks has motivated US companies’ desires to relocate to the UK.

“There is a clear tax motivation in such “inversion” transactions. If you look at the US tax system right now, for US based MNCs investing outside the US, there is a classic arrangement that permits minimal tax on overseas profits and deferral of US tax provided these profits remain offshore from the US.”

The full interview will be available on TPWeek.

Register for a free trial on TPWeek to read Ian Brimicombe’s comments in full.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
Gift this article