AstraZeneca’s Ian Brimicombe addresses BEPS and US inversion transactions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AstraZeneca’s Ian Brimicombe addresses BEPS and US inversion transactions

Ian Brimicombe, VP of corporate finance at AstraZeneca, discusses the struggle between regional and global compliance in an interview with TPWeek, and provides his views on topical transfer pricing issues.

Brimicombe has expressed his views on some of the most important transfer pricing issues in the headlines, including concerns over BEPS and country-by-country reporting and the increasing amount of US companies attempting inversion transactions in the UK.

Brimicombe has also spoken in detail with TPWeek about the makeup of AstraZeneca’s tax department, day-to-day transfer pricing issues and the company’s strategy for mitigating tax disputes.

The interview reveals the inner workings of the AstraZeneca tax department including its organisational structure, key objectives and tax dispute strategies.

“Our key objective is to implement domestic and international rules in a compliant way. On occasion it can be a challenge to secure agreements between governments as to how to allocate profits between the various activities located around the world,” Brimicombe said.

Brimicombe also addresses the issue of commercial sensitivity in relation to BEPS documentation requirements and gives an insight into what he thinks has motivated US companies’ desires to relocate to the UK.

“There is a clear tax motivation in such “inversion” transactions. If you look at the US tax system right now, for US based MNCs investing outside the US, there is a classic arrangement that permits minimal tax on overseas profits and deferral of US tax provided these profits remain offshore from the US.”

The full interview will be available on TPWeek.

Register for a free trial on TPWeek to read Ian Brimicombe’s comments in full.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
Gift this article