Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

P Chidambaram, the Indian Finance Minister, said in his budget speech today that rules on safe harbours will be issued.

chidambaram150.jpg

The rules will be issued after reports on safe harbour, issued by a designated committee, have been examined by the Finance Minister on March 31.

The announcement is long-awaited by tax professionals who want to see more certainty over their transfer prices with a smaller burden on compliance.

Safe harbours will provide taxpayers with rules they can follow and a margin under which transfer prices will be automatically accepted by the tax authorities.

They should help to reduce the considerable amount of tax litigation in the country, as, for certain types of transfer pricing transactions, taxpayers will not need to collect as much transfer pricing data .

It is hoped the safe harbour rules will make India a more attractive location to invest in because they will lower the risk of transfer pricing adjustments by the tax authorities.

The rules were originally tabled in the 2009 Finance Act but the margins have still not been set.

“Specifying safe harbour norms is not easy,” said Samir Gandhi of Deloitte. “It involves identifying the activities which will be eligible for safe harbour and the determination of mark-up or a margin for such activities.”

Gandhi used Mexico as an example because of its safe harbour rules relating to maquiladoras (captive contract manufacturers operating under virtually risk-free conditions). He thinks this is a good model for India because of the large number of captive units in the country.

“To deal with this vexed issue, Mexico has established the following safe harbours for the activity of maquiladoras: 6.5% return on total costs and 6.9% return on value of assets employed. Similarly, Australia operates a safe harbour provision for services where 7.5% mark up on cost is accepted. Similar administrative practices of safe harbour are prevalent in Switzerland and Belgium.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article