Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indian safe harbour rules will be issued says Chidambaram

P Chidambaram, the Indian Finance Minister, said in his budget speech today that rules on safe harbours will be issued.

chidambaram150.jpg

The rules will be issued after reports on safe harbour, issued by a designated committee, have been examined by the Finance Minister on March 31.

The announcement is long-awaited by tax professionals who want to see more certainty over their transfer prices with a smaller burden on compliance.

Safe harbours will provide taxpayers with rules they can follow and a margin under which transfer prices will be automatically accepted by the tax authorities.

They should help to reduce the considerable amount of tax litigation in the country, as, for certain types of transfer pricing transactions, taxpayers will not need to collect as much transfer pricing data .

It is hoped the safe harbour rules will make India a more attractive location to invest in because they will lower the risk of transfer pricing adjustments by the tax authorities.

The rules were originally tabled in the 2009 Finance Act but the margins have still not been set.

“Specifying safe harbour norms is not easy,” said Samir Gandhi of Deloitte. “It involves identifying the activities which will be eligible for safe harbour and the determination of mark-up or a margin for such activities.”

Gandhi used Mexico as an example because of its safe harbour rules relating to maquiladoras (captive contract manufacturers operating under virtually risk-free conditions). He thinks this is a good model for India because of the large number of captive units in the country.

“To deal with this vexed issue, Mexico has established the following safe harbours for the activity of maquiladoras: 6.5% return on total costs and 6.9% return on value of assets employed. Similarly, Australia operates a safe harbour provision for services where 7.5% mark up on cost is accepted. Similar administrative practices of safe harbour are prevalent in Switzerland and Belgium.”

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New reforms represent the most seismic shift in Canadian TP legislation since its enactment and a clear inflection point for MNEs, ITR has heard
Spain did not transpose EU VAT rules for SMEs or works of art; in other news, an increased VAT threshold came into force in South Africa
While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
Gift this article