International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

SAT’s Liao Tizhong emphasises China’s commitment to developing its transfer pricing regime

Liao Tizhong, deputy director general of international taxation in the State Administration of Taxation (SAT) of the People’s Republic of China, has emphasised the government’s commitment to developing its transfer pricing system in an interview with TPWeek, including setting-up a separate division for the administration of offshore income.


The official has spoken at length with TPWeek about China’s views on transfer pricing, such as where it stands on location specific advantages (LSA); how it feels about the OECD’s transfer pricing guidance; and the evolution of dispute resolution in the country.

The interview, which will be published in two parts, reveals the differences between China and the OECD. In particular, he went into great detail about LSAs, giving taxpayers a framework for calculating their cost in China.

Some taxpayers do not like to admit that location specific advantages exist: “I firmly believe that location savings do not give rise to an intangible that should be rewarded through transfer pricing”, said one European head of tax.

However, Liao said: “LSA is not an arm’s-length price issue, but it is there, like it or not. The world has to take it seriously. China does apply LSAs in both transfer pricing investigations and advance pricing agreements and is happy to meet understanding and acceptance by both taxpayers and competent authority counterparts.”

The official also spoke about how China intends to form a separate division, within its tax administration to deal with offshore income,

“In the foreseeable future, a separate division for the administration of offshore income will be set up to cope holistically with residents deriving income from abroad,” said Liao. “SAThas branches at the provincial level, the city level and the county level. Correspondingly the International Taxation Department has offices in most of the branches.”

Part one of Liao’s interview is available on TPWeek now. Part two will be published on Mondat April 22.

Register for a free trial on TPWeekto read Liao’s insights into China’s transfer pricing regime, including useful advice about calculations.

You can also read about Vietnam’s transfer pricing developments, in an interview with Nguyen Quang Tien, the head of Vietnam’s transfer pricing department, within the General Department of Taxation (DGT), also published this week.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A steady stream of countries has announced steps towards implementing pillar two, but Korea has got there first. Ralph Cunningham finds out what tax executives should do next.
The BEPS Monitoring Group has found a rare point of agreement with business bodies advocating an EU-wide one-stop-shop for compliance under BEFIT.
Former PwC partner Peter-John Collins has been banned from serving as a tax agent in Australia, while Brazil reports its best-ever year of tax collection on record.
Industry groups are concerned about the shift away from the ALP towards formulary apportionment as part of a common consolidated corporate tax base across the EU.
The former tax official in Italy will take up her post in April.
With marked economic disruption matched by a frenetic rate of regulatory upheaval, ITR partnered with Asia’s leading legal minds to navigate the continent’s growing complexity.
Lawmakers seem more reticent than ever to make ambitious tax proposals since the disastrous ‘mini-budget’ last September, but the country needs serious change.
The panel, the only one dedicated to tax at the World Economic Forum, comprised government ministers and other officials.
Colombian Finance Minister José Antonio Ocampo announced preparations for a Latin American tax summit, while the potentially ‘dangerous’ Inflation Reduction Act has come under fire.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution may increase global tax revenue gains by more than $200 billion a year, but pillar one is the key to such gains due to its fundamental changes to taxing rights.