Arm’s-length principle is still being called into question

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Arm’s-length principle is still being called into question

At the OECD’s public consultation in Paris this week, the arm’s-length principle was called into question a number of times by speakers.

While even those most opposed to the principle admitted they did not think it should be ignored completely, the general consensus was that if taxpayers are going to diverge from the principle, they should provide strong arguments as to why they have done so, rather than hiding behind definitional issues in transfer pricing guidance.

Richard Murphy, speaking on behalf of the BEPS Monitoring Group, said he felt there is a prevailing feeling that transfer pricing documentation exists to defend the arm’s-length principle.

“I’m not saying arm’s-length doesn’t have its use but if it worked properly we wouldn’t be here.”

In his closing remarks, Will Morris, chairman of BIAC’s (business advisory arm to the OECD) tax and fiscal policy committee said:

“I believe, in many areas, that the arm’s-length standard continues to work, and I also believe that there are good reasons for it being used as the default, or the starting point, in all areas.”

“However, where it doesn’t work, we shouldn’t try to cover that up by saying it does and then coming up with yet another ad hoc “improvement” to the arm’s-length-standard.”

Morris added that there may, in some cases, be very good reasons for diverging from the arm’s-length standard.

“But, if we’re going to do that, we should do it very clearly, and with full agreement from a broad range of countries that this is a different taxing principle. We do ourselves no favours by classifying it as just another arm’s-length standard method that may or may not work in a hierarchy of methods that businesses and different countries may choose, or not, to adopt. That only leads to more and more double taxation as countries go their different ways. We shouldn’t necessarily be scared of special methods. The arm’s-length-standard is the default, and the case needs to be made for deviating from it. But if that case can be made, then let’s do it transparently, and with a clear articulation of the taxing principle, so that the desired outcome is clear to all parties.”

Many tax treaties make allowances for formulary apportionment and the profit split method, so alternatives to the arm’s-length standard are available for taxpayers.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
Gift this article