Transfer pricing and related parties disclosures
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Transfer pricing and related parties disclosures


To ensure the respect of the arm’s length principle, Italian Law mandates that companies’ financial statements include proper disclosures regarding transactions with related parties. Piergiorgio Valente, managing partner of Valente Associati GEB Partners explains the logistics of the Italian rules.

As of November 21 2008, Legislative Decree No. 173/2008 modified Art. 2427 of the Italian Civil Code by adding paragraph 22-bis on related party disclosures.

For every relevant transaction with related parties, the amounts involved, the relationship between the parties and any other information necessary to understand such transactions, must be disclosed.

The definition of “related party” is provided by the international accounting standards adopted by the EU (accounting principle “IAS 24”).

With reference to the arm’s-length conditions, the government report on Legislative Decree No. 173/2008 explains that the circumstances leading to transactions with related parties rather than with third parties need to be evaluated and all criteria supporting such a decision must be provided.

Regarding the relevance of related parties’ transactions, the 2010 “Regulation on Disclosures Regarding Related Parties Transactions” by the Italian Companies and Stock Exchange Commission (Consob) defines a transaction as “relevant” if its value exceeds 5% of the net assets or the total assets/liabilities, depending on the type of transaction.

Relations with related entities must also be described in the companies’ management report attached to the financial statements, as per Art. 2428 of the Italian Civil Code.

Additionally, Arts. 3 and 4 of Legislative Decree No. 74/2000 establish criminal consequences for the incorrect application of transaction evaluation criteria.

Nevertheless, Art. 7 of the above-mentioned Decree excludes a wilful tax-evasion attempt if the financial statements describe the criteria applied in transfer pricing evaluations, since their explicit disclosure does not have a misleading connotation and seems incompatible with the intent to evade taxes.

Pursuant to Art. 2427, par. 1 of the Italian Civil Code, those criteria must be included in the explicatory note to the financial statements.

The law, however, does not clarify whether it is sufficient to state the transfer pricing methods or if more information (comparability analysis, prices and margins data, etcetera) is needed.

If interpreted too strictly, the law could entail revealing industrial and commercial secrets. Further, the explanatory note’s role and function are those of an accounting document that does not lend itself to bear the weight of complex tax considerations.

Yet, a generic reference to the criteria followed is not sufficient to rule out a tax-evasion attempt.

It is preferable to choose an intermediate solution, namely a detailed description of the steps leading to the determination of transfer prices. The Criminal Court will then verify the degree of specificity of each explanation; the greater the degree of specificity, the lower the risk of the Criminal Court challenging the adopted criteria for being vague.

Valente Associati GEB Partners

Viale Bianca Maria, 45

20122 Milan, Italy

Managing Partner: Piergiorgio Valente

Tel: +39 02 7626131

Fax: +39 02 76001091



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Yusuf Akhmadi of Indonesia’s Directorate General of Taxation reports on the country’s latest domestic and cross-border initiatives to clamp down on tax evasion
The new rate is a blow to Samsung, while two law firms have made significant tax hires into their respective Washington DC offices
Rema Serafi, KPMG’s first-ever female vice chair for tax, talks about breaking the mould in an exclusive interview with ITR
The metal multinational’s victory, in a case worth $12 million, continues the trend of companies coming out on top against India’s revenue department
Guy Bud and Matthew Greene from litigation firm Stewarts review a dispute on tiered partnerships, which raises questions on corporation tax and partnership law
The stagnating pay and tax bonuses cap follow slashed payouts for the deals team and business consolidation in the last month
A greater UN role has been secured after disagreements between developed and developing countries over the OECD’s influence in global tax reform
The US-based firm picks up investment fund specialist Ceinwen Rees, while Ireland nearly doubles its corporation tax receipts in three years
The order comes amid controversy over another of David Collard’s companies’ tax and TP affairs
NASSCOM, which represents over 3,000 Indian companies, has argued for the removal of the segmentation rule