OECD recognises demand for more guidance on guarantee fees and dispute resolution in transfer pricing

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

OECD recognises demand for more guidance on guarantee fees and dispute resolution in transfer pricing

Joe Andrus, head of the OECD’s transfer pricing unit, has told TPWeek that guarantee fees and credit ratings are an important issue for the OECD but it is not possible to say when a formal project on the topic might start until the final intangibles report is released.

oecd150.gif

In a TPWeek poll, 68% of readers said they want the OECD to look at guarantee fees and credit ratings in its next transfer pricing project.

A further 29% think dispute resolution should follow the transfer pricing aspects of intangibles project, which is being carried out by Working Party No 6 (WP6).

Just 3% thought the OECD should look beyond these issues for its next transfer pricing project.

Andrus said both guarantee fees and dispute resolution were both very important and the poll results demonstrate the demand for guidance.

“Unfortunately, the items currently on the plate of WP6 are likely to take some time to work through so there is no specific date by which the guarantee issue will be addressed,” said Andrus.

“We continue to consider what the specific steps may be that should be taken with regard to improving dispute resolution processes,” he added.

In an interview in International Tax Review magazine in April, Marlies de Ruiter, head of the tax treaties, transfer pricing and financial transactions division, spoke enthusiastically about wider dispute resolution work which the OECD will begin soon.

"I have been very involved with the earlier dispute resolution project and I have always been very proud of the work put out by the OECD. There are still some very important policy and implementation issues out there and that's why I am very happy there is going to be a follow up dispute resolution project where I will be involved. I am also very in favour of the work on simplification,” said de Ruiter.

"A lot of dispute cases are based on transfer pricing but the new project would look at the broader issue of dispute resolution in tax. One big question is implementation of guidance and arbitration in treaties and in the day to day work of competent authorities. This topic was the main subject of an OECD roundtable in January,” she said. “The roundtable showed that competent authorities, business and non-OECD countries also think it is an important issue so there is a broad support. The follow up of this roundtable will be that the OECD is going to organise a global forum on dispute resolution."

Considering the OECD was also voted the Leading Force in Global Transfer Pricing by almost 700 TPWeek readers, the expectation for more guidance in these areas will be high.

The most recent TPWeek poll is asking readers which of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) has the most developed transfer pricing regime. Vote on the TPWeek homepage.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The flagship 2025 tax legislation has sprawling implications for multinationals, including changes to GILTI and foreign-derived intangible income. Barry Herzog of HSF Kramer assesses the impact
Hani Ashkar, after more than 12 years leading PwC in the region, is set to be replaced by Laura Hinton
With the three-year anniversary of the PwC tax scandal approaching, it’s time to take stock of how tax agent regulation looks today
Rolling out the global minimum tax has increased complexity, according to Baker McKenzie; in other news, Donald Trump has announced a 25% tariff on countries doing business with Iran
Among those joining EY is PwC’s former international tax and transfer pricing head
The UK firm made the appointments as it seeks to recruit 160 new partners over the next two years
The network’s tax service line grew more than those for audit and assurance, advisory and legal services over the same period
The deal is a ‘real win’ for US-based multinationals and its announcement is a welcome relief, experts have told ITR
Tom Goldstein, who is now a blogger, is being represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson
In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Gift this article