Australia proposes changes to its customs transfer pricing approach

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia proposes changes to its customs transfer pricing approach

Australian Customs has proposed changes to the administration of its customs transfer pricing, which could make importing into Australia more cumbersome.

The amendments relate to the Australian Customs transfer pricing Statement No PS2009/21 on applying for valuation advice on transfer pricing.

The changes will place a greater emphasis on valuation methodologies. While the guidance will still acknowledge transfer pricing documentation, it will also look towards valuation methods such as the identical and similar goods methods, which can sometimes be impractical for taxpayers.

Instead of the bulk-amendment process which Australian taxpayers use after a post-importation transfer pricing adjustment, the changes will require line-by-line import entry adjustments, adding to taxpayers’ compliance in this already uncertain area of transfer pricing.

Australian Customs will become stricter in its approach to transfer pricing adjustments that change the customs value of duty-free goods, or any results in a tax refund.

The list of documents that a taxpayer must supply Australian Customs will also probably increase. As the requirements stand, Australian Customs has described the types of documents that it finds useful when considering transfer pricing issues.

These changes are open to public consultation and, combined with other changes to the transfer pricing regime in Australia, they could add significantly to taxpayers’ compliance burden. It is therefore important for taxpayers to assess the practicality of these changes.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
Gift this article