Mining for insights from transfer pricing leaders

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mining for insights from transfer pricing leaders

Taxpayers should not pass the opportunity to get answers from influential transfer pricing officials in September.

The importance of transfer pricing as a reputational issue means it is critical that taxpayers have the right policies to enable them to comply with their obligations on the topic around the world.

Businesses need to understand national rules on related-party transactions, develop the best ways - including having the right technology - to adhere to them and maintain an awareness of how the rules might be changed or added to in the future.

Their knowledge and understanding of national transfer pricing laws and rulings in a given jurisdiction allows tax departments to make the right decisions on subjects, such as the financing of a subsidiary, the location of an R&D project, the suitability of an advance pricing agreement, the correct methodology when documenting a transaction or the approach to take when faced with an audit, as well as monitor tax risk.

Australia, Canada and the UK are three jurisdictions that have proposed amendments or gone ahead with rewrites to their transfer pricing regimes in the last few months. Advance pricing agreements are now possible in Hong Kong and India - though no guidance has been published in that country yet. And concepts such as management fees and location savings are getting wider exposure around the world.

These are important developments that require careful thought and analysis, particularly at a time when transfer pricing rules and regulations are developing rapidly all over the world, judges are getting the opportunity to interpret existing laws, sometimes in unforeseen ways, and tax administration is becoming more and more international, with ideas and tips being passed back and forth by revenue authorities all the time.

The Ask the Authorities panel at September’s Global Transfer Pricing Forum, hosted by International Tax Review and TPWeek, offers executives a unique platform to get answers to their questions about related-party matters.

Officials from three countries will field queries about all aspects of transfer pricing during the 75-minute discussion at 1.30pm on September 25. The agenda covers documentation, legal certainty, advance pricing agreements, joint audits and alternative dispute resolution, though the participation of Michelle Levac, of the Canada Revenue Agency, who chairs the OECD’s Working Party No 6, makes it likely that the multilateral organisation’s most recent projects on intangibles and restructuring will also come up.

The other panellists are Eric Lesprit, the head of the APA team at the French Tax Administration and Peter Steeds, who took over as head of transfer pricing at HM Revenue & Customs in the UK last October.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article