FREE: Vietnam revenue pledges to focus on transfer pricing deceptions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FREE: Vietnam revenue pledges to focus on transfer pricing deceptions

The Ho Chi Minh City Tax Department in Vietnam has promised to investigate global companies who claim to make consistent losses in the country.

vietnam150.png

In an interview with newspaper, Tuoi Tre, Le Thi Thu Huong, deputy director of the city’s revenue department said a business may establish two or three companies at the same time and then adjust the revenue to avoid paying tax.

One method companies use is to register an affiliate on the country’s stock exchange and then let other affiliates contribute profits to the listed one so it appears to be doing better than it is and pushes the share price up to deceive investors.

The revenue official said 15 out of 197 domestic firms that reported losses in 2010 are suspected of engaging in transfer pricing after inspection. Of these 15, she added, four will be followed closely.

Huong said the inspection has paid off so far, uncovering several domestic companies, which show signs of transfer pricing abuse, but it is difficult for the tax department because of the problems involved in confirming selling prices between these businesses and others internationally.

“The Finance Ministry’s Circular 66 currently is the base for transfer pricing fighting with five price calculation and comparison methods,” said Huong. “However, a tax officer finds it difficult to carry out the methods as he cannot base them on any independent data provider and has to survey and collect information from the market and related agencies. For FIEs [foreign invested enterprises], authorities should provide tax departments with policies in their home countries to make comparisons.”

The tax agency plans to focus its inspection on those businesses suspected of transfer pricing over the 2011 to 2015 period.

The loss-making companies still enjoy value-added tax refunds.

“They should be responsible for paying taxes to support development of the country where we operate, in addition to providing jobs for locals. This is a matter of business ethics for business people and FIEs,” Huong said.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
The US president’s threats expose how one superpower can subjugate other countries using tariffs as an economic weapon
The US president has softened his stance on tariffs over Greenland; in other news, a partner from Osborne Clarke has won a High Court appeal against the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Emmanuel Manda tells ITR about early morning boxing, working on Zambia’s only refinery, and what makes tax cool
Hany Elnaggar examines how AI is reshaping tax administration across the Gulf Cooperation Council, transforming the taxpayer experience from periodic reporting to continuous compliance
The APA resolution signals opportunities for multinationals and will pacify investor concerns, local experts told ITR
Businesses that adopt a proactive strategy and work closely with their advisers will be in the greatest position to transform HMRC’s relief scheme into real support for growth
The ATO and other authorities have been clamping down on companies that have failed to pay their tax
The flagship 2025 tax legislation has sprawling implications for multinationals, including changes to GILTI and foreign-derived intangible income. Barry Herzog of HSF Kramer assesses the impact
Gift this article