FREE: Vietnam revenue pledges to focus on transfer pricing deceptions

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


FREE: Vietnam revenue pledges to focus on transfer pricing deceptions

The Ho Chi Minh City Tax Department in Vietnam has promised to investigate global companies who claim to make consistent losses in the country.

vietnam150.png

In an interview with newspaper, Tuoi Tre, Le Thi Thu Huong, deputy director of the city’s revenue department said a business may establish two or three companies at the same time and then adjust the revenue to avoid paying tax.

One method companies use is to register an affiliate on the country’s stock exchange and then let other affiliates contribute profits to the listed one so it appears to be doing better than it is and pushes the share price up to deceive investors.

The revenue official said 15 out of 197 domestic firms that reported losses in 2010 are suspected of engaging in transfer pricing after inspection. Of these 15, she added, four will be followed closely.

Huong said the inspection has paid off so far, uncovering several domestic companies, which show signs of transfer pricing abuse, but it is difficult for the tax department because of the problems involved in confirming selling prices between these businesses and others internationally.

“The Finance Ministry’s Circular 66 currently is the base for transfer pricing fighting with five price calculation and comparison methods,” said Huong. “However, a tax officer finds it difficult to carry out the methods as he cannot base them on any independent data provider and has to survey and collect information from the market and related agencies. For FIEs [foreign invested enterprises], authorities should provide tax departments with policies in their home countries to make comparisons.”

The tax agency plans to focus its inspection on those businesses suspected of transfer pricing over the 2011 to 2015 period.

The loss-making companies still enjoy value-added tax refunds.

“They should be responsible for paying taxes to support development of the country where we operate, in addition to providing jobs for locals. This is a matter of business ethics for business people and FIEs,” Huong said.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Gregor McMillan of Howden explains how insurance-backed financing can help businesses and funds unlock liquidity from tax receivables and other contingent claims
The arrival of Alex Anderson swiftly follows that of funds tax specialist Stuart Alter and suggests the Tier 3-ranked firm has higher ambitions
One of the two appointments is EY’s Gordon McIntosh, who becomes the big four firm’s second senior tax departure in September
Balson's move from a Tier 1 practice to a Tier 3 competitor looks counterintuitive. The market data suggests it is anything but
Awards
It was another banner year for Deloitte, which picked up more awards than any other firm at a gala ceremony held at The Londoner in Leicester Square
The big four firm has been embroiled in a scandal over partners’ misuse of confidential board papers to pitch for and win corporate audits for Westpac and Dexus
Drawing on lessons from the PepsiCo case, tax lawyer Paul McNab explains why the ATO's latest royalty guidance should concern multinationals well beyond the technology sector
As pillar two exposes the limits of fragmented tax processes, organisations are rethinking their operating models to create the trusted data foundations that AI demands
World Tax data shows Matt Donnelly is moving from a Tier 3 transactional tax practice to a Tier 1 market leader, underlining Kirkland & Ellis’s pull at the top end of the market
Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Gift this article