International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

French Tax Authority must change interest rate audit policy


Gianmarco Monsellato and William Finan, at TP Week sponsor Taj, argue for a policy change on intra-group interest rates


Recent experience with the French Tax Administration (FTA) on audits of internal or intra-group loans suggests that the FTA’s auditing methodology is inconsistent in several important aspects with generally accepted principles of finance and the international rules which apply to these transactions.

Like other tax administrations in the European Union (EU), the French government recently issued updated regulations regarding what are called thin capitalisation or thin cap rules. The standard approach to setting an interest rate in the open market is for potential lenders to determine a borrower’s creditworthiness. In the intra-group context this translates into determining the market risk spread over a base lending rate based on the standalone creditworthiness of the affiliate, considering the maturity of the loan and other conditions.

Included into the credit scoring process is the amount of debt being borrowed. This approach to setting the intra-group lending rate can be called the separated approach, meaning that that affiliate is reviewed on a stand-alone or separate basis with no guarantee, implicit or explicit, from the parent company.

The FTA, however, seems to have adopted an alternative approach to determining the intra-group lending rate based on what can be called the integrated approach. This approach treats all the members of a multinational group as a single, integrated economic unit. In applying this approach the FTA implicitly creates a guarantee from the lending parent to its affiliate in order to justify artificially reducing the credit risk spread hence lowering the intra-group lending rate.

In some instances the FTA has even gone further in seeking ways to lower the intra-group lending rate by arguing that the credit risk spread should be determined even before the loan amount is considered. Such an approach is obviously inconsistent with how the credit scoring process works where the ability of the borrower to bear additional debt is considered in establishing the creditworthiness of the borrower and hence is factored into setting the market interest rate on the loan. (Imagine if you or I walked into our local bank and asked to borrower 100M euros and the bank evaluated our creditworthiness before considering the amount of loan – this effectively is what the FTA approach does.)

If the FTA’s integrated approach to setting intra-group interest rates, even absent carrying it to the extreme of ignoring the borrower’s ability to bear the additional debt, to setting intra-group interest rates becomes widely adopted in the EU and elsewhere, then a French group parent lenders would generally have to lend to their affiliates at interest rates inconsistent with the independent risk profile of the borrowing affiliate. Thus, French group lenders would then be caught in a situation where, per the FTA’s methodology, they cannot charge market interest rates on their intra-group loans and French tax revenues would be lower.

This outcome illustrates one important reason why the separated approach is the prevailing one in determining the results for intra-group transactions. The separated approach is also preferred over the integrated approach from the standpoint of being consistent with the generally accepted international norm, the arm’s length principle. The arm’s length principle would evaluate a groups’ affiliates a standalone basis.

Now is the time for the administration to carefully reflect on how intra-group interest rates should be audited in France. Considering generally accepted principles of finance and international rules, the answer is quite evident -- applying the separated approach as the basis for its auditing methodology leads to the right answer. Once having validated this approach, it would be helpful to French groups if the FTA when take the lead in aligning other EU member states’ audit practices to follow apply the same approach. It would be in France’s economic interest to take this step.

Gianmarco Monsellato, managing partner, and William Finan, transfer pricing partner, Taj, a member of Deloitte Touche Tomhatsu

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.
The plan is aimed at simplifying tax rules and lowering tax compliance costs for cross-border businesses in the EU.