Switzerland edges closer to reforming withholding taxes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland edges closer to reforming withholding taxes

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

In the course of its March 8 2019 meeting, Switzerland's Federal Council took note of an expert board's report and its recommendations for reforming Swiss withholding taxes (WHTs).

The report aims to strengthen the Swiss debt capital market and securing tax compliance. It rests on two main pillars:

  1. The abolishment of WHTs on interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors; and

  2. he introduction of a paying agent model and expansion of the WHT regime to include income that Swiss resident individual investors receive from foreign investments.

The WHT regime in Switzerland currently follows the debtor principle. This sees the Swiss payer of interest or dividends deduct a WHT of 35%. This is then deposited with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, and 65% of the net amount is then credited to the investor.

Abolishment of WHTs on interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors

Interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors will no longer be subject to the Swiss WHT. This measure would make it more attractive for investors to purchase Swiss bonds and for Swiss companies to perform cash pooling and treasury functions domestically.

Introduction of paying agent principle

For payments that fall under the paying agent system for a Swiss resident individual investor, as listed below, the Swiss paying agents (i.e. the Swiss banks), would deduct the WHT and deposit it with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, which in principle is similar to how the US withholding agent regime works.

The following types of income fall under the paying agent system:

  • Interest from Swiss and foreign bonds;

  • Dividends from foreign stocks or similar equity instruments; and

  • Interest from domestic bank accounts.

Under the report, the following will remain subject to the debtor principle:

  • Dividends from Swiss stocks and similar equity instruments;

  • Domestic lottery wins; and

  • Domestic insurance benefits.

Indirect investments will generally be treated as direct investments. This means that their income will fall under the paying agent principle, except for the share of income allocable to dividends from Swiss stocks and similar equity instruments.

The suggestions by the expert board report addresses a long-standing backlog of reforms, and an urgent concern of capital market participants.

Many aspects of the proposal are undoubtedly appealing and support the intended objective. However, the suggested reform lacks any positive features for wealthy Swiss resident individuals who already declare all of their investments and related income.

Furthermore, the planned 35% WHT on foreign dividend and interest income, coupled with liquidity implications around year-end, would be a clear disadvantage.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article