Switzerland edges closer to reforming withholding taxes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland edges closer to reforming withholding taxes

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_deloitte.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

In the course of its March 8 2019 meeting, Switzerland's Federal Council took note of an expert board's report and its recommendations for reforming Swiss withholding taxes (WHTs).

The report aims to strengthen the Swiss debt capital market and securing tax compliance. It rests on two main pillars:

  1. The abolishment of WHTs on interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors; and

  2. he introduction of a paying agent model and expansion of the WHT regime to include income that Swiss resident individual investors receive from foreign investments.

The WHT regime in Switzerland currently follows the debtor principle. This sees the Swiss payer of interest or dividends deduct a WHT of 35%. This is then deposited with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, and 65% of the net amount is then credited to the investor.

Abolishment of WHTs on interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors

Interest paid to Swiss corporate and to foreign investors will no longer be subject to the Swiss WHT. This measure would make it more attractive for investors to purchase Swiss bonds and for Swiss companies to perform cash pooling and treasury functions domestically.

Introduction of paying agent principle

For payments that fall under the paying agent system for a Swiss resident individual investor, as listed below, the Swiss paying agents (i.e. the Swiss banks), would deduct the WHT and deposit it with the Swiss Federal Tax Administration, which in principle is similar to how the US withholding agent regime works.

The following types of income fall under the paying agent system:

  • Interest from Swiss and foreign bonds;

  • Dividends from foreign stocks or similar equity instruments; and

  • Interest from domestic bank accounts.

Under the report, the following will remain subject to the debtor principle:

  • Dividends from Swiss stocks and similar equity instruments;

  • Domestic lottery wins; and

  • Domestic insurance benefits.

Indirect investments will generally be treated as direct investments. This means that their income will fall under the paying agent principle, except for the share of income allocable to dividends from Swiss stocks and similar equity instruments.

The suggestions by the expert board report addresses a long-standing backlog of reforms, and an urgent concern of capital market participants.

Many aspects of the proposal are undoubtedly appealing and support the intended objective. However, the suggested reform lacks any positive features for wealthy Swiss resident individuals who already declare all of their investments and related income.

Furthermore, the planned 35% WHT on foreign dividend and interest income, coupled with liquidity implications around year-end, would be a clear disadvantage.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Gift this article