International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Chilean tax authority increases transfer pricing audits


Gabriel Bernal

Over the last couple of years, Chile has been experiencing significant changes with regards to transfer pricing, which have been changing the way local taxpayers view their inter-company transactions. Even though Chilean transfer pricing legislation was introduced in 1997, being amongst the first in the region, Article 38 of the Chilean Income Tax Law (ITL) seemed to be insufficient, since it did not include relevant technical matters such as a detailed description of the TP methods, nor did it incorporate internationally accepted practices on this matter.

However, ever since Chile became an active member of the OECD in 2010, the Chilean IRS has been very active with regards to transfer pricing and has incorporated qualified personnel with wide experience in this area. This circumstance led to a series of selective reviews by the Chilean IRS, where it was clearly perceived that a highly trained team was behind the TP audits, since the information requests (notifications and summons) and tax assessments issued by the local tax authority, demonstrated a clear understanding of the internationally accepted practices and concepts, regarding transfer pricing.

In the context of the tax reform of September 27 2012, significant changes that modernised Chilean TP legislation were introduced by means of Article 41E of the Chilean ITL. Among other aspects the new Chilean TP legislation introduced the following: i) OECD aligned transfer pricing methods; ii) requirement to file an annual informative return (affidavit); iii) introduction of an APA programme; and iv) possibility to request corresponding adjustments), this new TP legislation incorporated the formal requirement to file by electronic means, on a yearly basis, a transfer pricing informative return (affidavit) on June 28 2013, for the intercompany transactions performed on the previous calendar year (starting on CY 2012).

This new source of information will allow the Chilean IRS to build a database with very detailed data about the taxpayer's intercompany transactions, because of the fact that this transfer pricing return was strategically and technically developed by the Chilean tax authority, with the purpose of requesting very detailed information per type of transaction (tangible goods, financing transactions, intangible assets, services and current mercantile accounts). Therefore, it is expected that the Chilean IRS will use this database to perform even more specific and focused TP audits.

On the other hand, the Chilean IRS has been very open to Chilean taxpayers requesting advanced pricing agreements (APAs), since new TP legislation also introduced this possibility, which has led to a series of APAs already requested by local taxpayers to the Chilean IRS, to have certainty of the fulfillment of the arm's-length principle, from a Chilean transfer pricing perspective.

Chile has entered a path of no return with regards to transfer pricing, which will imply that Chilean taxpayers will have to be more careful when performing intercompany transaction, to avoid possible risks on this relevant tax area.

Gabriel Bernal (


Tel: (+56 2) 2940 0405


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023